...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Marginal zone B-cell lymphoma: A clinical comparison of nodal and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue types. Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Classification Project.
【24h】

Marginal zone B-cell lymphoma: A clinical comparison of nodal and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue types. Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Classification Project.

机译:边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤:淋巴结和黏膜相关淋巴组织类型的临床比较。非霍奇金淋巴瘤分类项目。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: In the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of lymphoma, extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (MZL) of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type is listed as a distinctive entity. However, nodal MZL is listed as a provisional entity because of questions as to whether it is truly a disease or just an advanced stage of MALT-type MZL. To resolve the issue of whether primary nodal MZL without involvement of mucosal sites exists and whether it is clinically different from extranodal MALT-type lymphoma, we compared the clinical features of these two lymphomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five expert hematopathologists reached a consensus diagnosis of MZL in 93 patients. Seventy-three were classified as having MALT-type MZL because of involvement of a mucosal site at the time of diagnosis, and 20 were classified as having nodal MZL because of involvement of lymph nodes without involvement of a mucosal site. RESULTS: A comparison of the clinical features of nodal MZL and MALT-type MZL showed that more patients with nodal MZL presented with advanced-stage disease (71% v 34%; P =. 02), peripheral lymphadenopathy (100% v 8%; P <.001), and para-aortic lymphadenopathy (56% v 14%; P <.001) than those with MALT-type MZL. However, fewer patients with nodal MZL had a large mass (> or = 5 cm) than those with MALT-type MZL (31% v 68%; P =.03). The 5-year overall survival of patients with nodal MZL was lower than that for patients with MALT-type MZL (56% v 81%; P =.09), with a similar result for failure-free survival (28% v 65%; P =.01). Comparisons of patients with International Prognostic Index scores of 0 to 3 showed that those with nodal MZL had lower 5-year overall survival (52% v 88%; P =.025) and failure-free survival (30% v 75%; P =.007) rates than those with MALT-type MZL. CONCLUSION: Nodal MZL seems to be a distinctive disease entity rather than an advanced stage of MALT-type MZL because the clinical presentations and survival outcomes are different in these two types of MZL. Clinically, nodal MZL is similar to other low-grade, node-based B-cell lymphomas, such as follicular and small lymphocytic lymphomas.
机译:目的:在国际淋巴瘤研究小组对淋巴瘤的分类中,黏膜相关淋巴组织(MALT)类型的结外边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤(MZL)被列为独特的实体。但是,由于关于MZL是真正的疾病还是MALT型MZL的晚期阶段的问题,它被列为临时实体。为了解决是否存在不涉及粘膜部位的原发性淋巴结MZL以及与淋巴结外MALT型淋巴瘤在临床上是否存在差异的问题,我们比较了这两种淋巴瘤的临床特征。患者与方法:五位专家血液病理学家对93例患者进行了MZL共识诊断。由于诊断时粘膜位点累及,有73例归类为MALT型MZL,由于淋巴结累及而无粘膜位点,有20例归类为MALT型淋巴结。结果:淋巴结MZL和MALT型MZL的临床特征比较表明,更多的淋巴结MZL患者出现晚期疾病(71%v 34%; P =。02),外周淋巴结病(100%v 8%) ; P <.001)和主动脉旁淋巴结病(56%vs 14%; P <.001)高于MALT型MZL。但是,结节性MZL结节(>或= 5 cm)的患者少于MALT型MZL结节(31%对68%; P = .03)。结节性MZL患者的5年总生存率低于MALT型MZL患者(56%v 81%; P = .09),无故障生存率相似(28%v 65%) ; P = .01)。对国际预后指数评分为0到3的患者进行比较,结果显示,结节性MZL的患者5年总生存率较低(52%v 88%; P = .025),无故障生存率(30%v 75%; P = .007)率高于MALT型MZL。结论:结节性MZL似乎是一种独特的疾病,而不是MALT型MZL的晚期,因为这两种类型的MZL的临床表现和生存结果均不同。临床上,淋巴结MZL与其他低度,基于节点的B细胞淋巴瘤相似,例如滤泡性和小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号