首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Toxicity of fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: effect of administration schedule and prognostic factors. Meta-Analysis Group In Cancer.
【24h】

Toxicity of fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: effect of administration schedule and prognostic factors. Meta-Analysis Group In Cancer.

机译:氟尿嘧啶对晚期大肠癌患者的毒性:给药方案和预后因素的影响。癌症的荟萃分析小组。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: Fluorouracil (5-FU) continuous infusion is superior to 5-FU bolus in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, but the survival difference between the two treatments is small and, therefore, the difference in toxicity profile is crucial in choosing a treatment for individual patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of all randomized trials that compared 5-FU bolus with 5-FU CI, based on individual data from 1,219 patients, to compare the toxicity of the two schedules of 5-FU administration and to identify predictive factors for toxicity. The toxicities considered were World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 to 4 anemia, thrombopenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, mucositis, and hand-foot syndrome. RESULTS: Hematologic toxicity, mainly neutropenia, was more frequent with 5-FU bolus than with 5-FU CI (31% and 4%, respectively; P < .0001). Hand-foot syndrome was less frequent with 5-FU bolus than with 5-FU CI (13% and 34%, respectively; P < .0001). There was no difference between the two treatment groups in terms of other nonhematologic toxicities. Independent prognostic factors were age, sex, and performance status for nonhematologic toxicities, performance status, and treatment for hematologic toxicities, and age, sex, and treatment for hand-foot syndrome. CONCLUSION: Based on a large data set, this study confirmed and quantified the toxicity profile of the two schedules of administration of 5-FU and allowed the identification of clinical predictors of toxicity.
机译:目的:氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)连续输注在晚期结直肠癌患者中优于5-FU推注,但两种治疗之间的生存期差异很小,因此,毒性谱的差异对于选择治疗方法至关重要。个别患者。材料与方法:我们对所有随机试验进行了荟萃分析,根据1,219例患者的个人数据,比较了5-FU推注与5-FU CI的比较,以比较两种5-FU给药方案的毒性并确定毒性的预测因素。所考虑的毒性是世界卫生组织(WHO)的3至4级贫血,血小板减少症,白细胞减少症,中性粒细胞减少症,恶心/呕吐,腹泻,粘膜炎和手足综合症。结果:5-FU推注的血液学毒性(主要是中性粒细胞减少)比5-FU CI的更为频繁(分别为31%和4%; P <.0001)。与5-FU CI相比,使用5-FU推注时手足综合征的发生率较低(分别为13%和34%; P <.0001)。就其他非血液学毒性而言,两个治疗组之间没有差异。独立的预后因素是年龄,性别和非血液系统毒性的表现状态,性能状况和血液毒性的治疗方法,年龄,性别和手足综合征的治疗方法。结论:基于大量数据,该研究证实并定量了两种5-FU给药方案的毒性特征,并确定了毒性的临床预测指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号