...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy alone for regionally advanced unresectable stage III Non-small-cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B.
【24h】

Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy alone for regionally advanced unresectable stage III Non-small-cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

机译:对于区域晚期不可切除的III期非小细胞肺癌,诱导化疗后放化疗与单独放化疗相比。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Standard therapy for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer includes concomitant chemoradiotherapy. In Cancer and Leukemia Group B 39801, we evaluated whether induction chemotherapy before concurrent chemoradiotherapy would result in improved survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1998 and May 2002, 366 patients were randomly assigned to arm A, which involved immediate concurrent chemoradiotherapy with carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 2 and paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 given weekly during 66 Gy of chest radiotherapy, or arm B, which involved two cycles of carboplatin AUC 6 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 administered every 21 days followed by identical chemoradiotherapy. The accrual goal was 360 patients. RESULTS: Thirty-four percent of patients were female, 66% were male, and the median age was 63 years. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities during induction chemotherapy on arm B consisted mainly of neutropenia (18% and 20%, respectively). During concurrent chemoradiotherapy, there was no difference in severity of in-field toxicities of esophagitis (grade 3 and 4 were, respectively, 30% and 2% for arm A v 28% and 8% for arm B) and dyspnea (grade 3 and 4 were, respectively, 11% and 3% for arm A v 15% and 4% for arm B). Survival differences were not statistically significant (P = .3), with a median survival on arm A of 12 months (95% CI, 10 to 16 months) versus 14 months (95% CI, 11 to 16 months) on arm B and a 2-year survival of 29% (95% CI, 22% to 35%) and 31% (95% CI, 25% to 38%). Age, weight loss before therapy, and performance status were statistically significant predictive factors. CONCLUSION: The addition of induction chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy added toxicity and provided no survival benefit over concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone. The median survival achieved in each of the treatment groups is low, and the routine use of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel with simultaneous radiotherapy should be re-examined.
机译:目的:不可切除的III期非小细胞肺癌的标准疗法包括放化疗。在癌症和白血病B组39801中,我们评估了同时放化疗之前的诱导化疗是否会改善生存率。患者与方法:1998年7月至2002年5月,将366例患者随机分配至A组,其中包括在浓度-时间曲线(AUC)为2的情况下立即同时进行放化疗,并在66 Gy期间每周给予紫杉醇50 mg / m2胸部放疗或B组,每21天服用两个周期的卡铂AUC 6和紫杉醇200 mg / m2,然后进行相同的放化疗。应计目标是360名患者。结果:34%的患者为女性,66%为男性,中位年龄为63岁。 B组诱导化疗期间的3级或4级毒性主要由中性粒细胞减少症组成(分别为18%和20%)。在同步放化疗期间,食管炎的现场毒性的严重程度(3级和4级分别为A组为30%和2%,B组为28%和8%)和呼吸困难(3级和4级)没有差异。 4组分别为A组11%和3%,B组15%和4%)。生存差异无统计学意义(P = .3),A组的中位生存期为12个月(CI为95%,为10至16个月),而B组和B组为14个月(CI为95%,为11至16个月)。 2年生存率分别为29%(95%CI,22%至35%)和31%(95%CI,25%至38%)。年龄,治疗前体重减轻和运动状态是统计学上重要的预测因素。结论:同期放化疗中加入诱导化疗增加了毒性,并且与单纯同时放化疗相比没有生存优势。每个治疗组的中位生存率均较低,应重新检查每周一次卡铂和紫杉醇同时放疗的常规使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号