...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Quality of life in operable colon cancer patients receiving oral compared with intravenous chemotherapy: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Trial C-06.
【24h】

Quality of life in operable colon cancer patients receiving oral compared with intravenous chemotherapy: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Trial C-06.

机译:与静脉化疗相比,口服口服可手术结肠癌患者的生活质量:国家外科手术辅助乳腺癌和肠项目试验C-06的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: We compared health-related quality of life (HRQL), symptoms, and convenience of care (COC) in patients with stage II/III carcinoma of the colon who received either oral uracil/ftorafur (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV) or standard intravenous (IV) fluorouracil (FU) plus LV as adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We measured HRQL with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) questionnaire, Short Form-36 Vitality Scale (SF-36), and a Quality of Life Rating Scale (QLRS) at baseline, once during chemotherapy, and at 1 year. We used the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS) and treatment-specific Symptom Checklist (SCL) to assess symptoms and a modified Burden of Care form to assess COC at baseline, on day 1 of each treatment cycle, and at 1 year. Repeated measures analyses controlling for demographic variables and baseline scores were used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: The study accrued 1,608 patients, 803 to the FU arm and 805 to the UFT arm. There were no differences between the arms in overall FACT-C scores, FACT-C scores within the subscales of colon-specific, physical, emotional, social, and functional health, or QLRS scores. Patients taking UFT reported substantially higher COC. Statistically significant but small differences were observed for SF-36, favoring FU, and for SDS and SCL, both favoring UFT. CONCLUSION: Patients perceive adjuvant treatment with UFT + LV as more convenient than standard IV treatment with FU + LV. Both regimens are well tolerated and do not differ in their impact on HRQL.
机译:目的:我们比较了接受口服尿嘧啶/氟尿嘧啶(UFT)加亚叶酸(LV)或口服尿嘧啶/氟托拉夫(UL)或口服尿嘧啶/氟托拉夫(UFT)或II / III期结肠癌的患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQL),症状和护理便利(COC)标准静脉(IV)氟尿嘧啶(FU)加LV作为辅助化疗。患者和方法:我们在基线时用一次癌症治疗-结直肠功能评估(FACT-C)问卷,简短表格36生命量表(SF-36)和生活质量量表(QLRS)来测量HRQL。化疗,并于1年后。我们使用症状困扰量表(SDS)和特定于治疗的症状清单(SCL)来评估症状,并使用改良的护理负担表在基线,每个治疗周期的第1天和1年评估COC。控制人口统计学变量和基线得分的重复测量分析用于统计比较。结果:该研究共招募了1,608例患者,其中FU臂803例,UFT臂805例。在总体FACT-C得分,结肠特异性,身体,情绪,社交和功能健康状况子量表内的FACT-C得分或QLRS得分之间,两组之间没有差异。服用UFT的患者报告的COC明显更高。 SF-36(支持FU),SDS和SCL(均支持UFT)在统计上有显着差异,但差异很小。结论:患者认为UFT + LV的辅助治疗比FU + LV的标准IV治疗更方便。两种方案均耐受良好,并且对HRQL的影响没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号