首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Phase III, double-blind, controlled trial of atamestane plus toremifene compared with letrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced receptor-positive breast cancer.
【24h】

Phase III, double-blind, controlled trial of atamestane plus toremifene compared with letrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced receptor-positive breast cancer.

机译:晚期接受受体阳性乳腺癌的绝经后妇女进行的第三期双盲对照试验(阿马西坦联合托瑞米芬与来曲唑比较)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare time to progression (TTP) with a steroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) atamestane (ATA) combined with toremifene (TOR; complete estrogen blockade) versus letrozole (LET) in receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility included postmenopausal receptor-positive ABC and adjuvant hormonal therapy completed more than 12 months prior to study entry. Participants received daily ATA 500 mg with TOR 60 mg (ATA + TOR), or letrozole 2.5 mg (LET). The primary end point was TTP, whereas secondary objectives included objective response (OR), overall survival (OS), and time to treatment failure (TTF). The study had 80% power to detect a 25% increase in TTP assuming a TTP of 9.4 months in the LET population. RESULTS: A total of 865 patients were randomly assigned (434 to ATA + TOR and 431 to LET) in 60 centers in the United States, Canada, Russia, and Ukraine. Baseline characteristics were balanced. Median TTP was identical in the two arms at 11.2 months (P < .92).Median TTF was similar at 9.24 months (ATA + TOR) versus 10.44 months (LET). The hazard ratios (LET/ATA + TOR) were 1.00 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.08) for TTP, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.06) for TTF, and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.11) for OS. OR occurred in 30% of patients receiving ATA + TOR and in 36% of patients receiving LET (P < .1). Adverse events (AEs) were similar for patients receiving ATA + TOR versus LET, and serious AEs were 10% v 11%, respectively. CONCLUSION: TTP for patients receiving ATA + TOR was identical to that for patients receiving LET, representing the first endocrine therapy comparable to LET in ABC. Unlike in the Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, and Combined trial, addition of an antiestrogen did not decrease efficacy of the AI. Future studies of AIs in combination with more effective selective estrogen receptor modulators or selective receptor downregulators is warranted.
机译:目的:比较类固醇芳香化酶抑制剂(AI),金刚烷烃(ATA)与托瑞米芬(TOR;完全雌激素阻滞)与来曲唑(LET)相比于受体阳性晚期乳腺癌(ABC)的进展时间(TTP)。患者和方法:入选对象包括绝经后受体阳性的ABC以及在进入研究前12个月以上完成的辅助激素治疗。参与者每天接受ATA 500毫克,TOR 60毫克(ATA + TOR)或来曲唑2.5毫克(LET)。主要终点是TTP,而次要目标包括客观反应(OR),总生存期(OS)和治疗失败时间(TTF)。假设LET人群的TTP为9.4个月,则该研究具有80%的能力检测TTP升高25%。结果:在美国,加拿大,俄罗斯和乌克兰的60个中心中,共随机分配了865位患者(434位患者用于ATA + TOR,431位患者用于LET)。基线特征是平衡的。两组的中位TTP在11.2个月相同(P <.92)。中位TTF在9.24个月(ATA + TOR)与10.44个月(LET)相似。对于TTP,危险比(LET / ATA + TOR)为1.00(95%CI,0.92至1.08),对于TTF为0.99(95%CI,0.92至1.06),对于OS为0.98(95%CI,0.87至1.11) 。接受ATA + TOR的患者中有30%发生了OR,接受LET的患者中有36%发生了OR(P <.1)。接受ATA + TOR与LET的患者的不良事件(AEs)相似,严重的AEs分别为10%vs 11%。结论:接受ATA + TOR的患者的TTP与接受LET的患者的TTP相同,代表了首例与ABC中的LET相当的内分泌治疗。与阿那曲唑,他莫昔芬和联合试验不同,添加抗雌激素不会降低AI的疗效。有必要对AI与更有效的选择性雌激素受体调节剂或选择性受体下调剂结合进行进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号