...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Randomized comparison of every-2-week darbepoetin alfa and weekly epoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia: the 20030125 Study Group Trial.
【24h】

Randomized comparison of every-2-week darbepoetin alfa and weekly epoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia: the 20030125 Study Group Trial.

机译:每2周一次darbepoetin alfa和每周一次epoetin alfa治疗化疗引起的贫血的随机比较:20030125研究组试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced anemia is widely treated in the United States with darbepoetin alfa (DA) or epoetin alfa (EA). This noninferiority study systematically compares efficacy and safety of DA and EA using common doses and schedules used in clinical practice. METHODS: Patients had a diagnosis of nonmyeloid malignancy with > or = 8 weeks of planned chemotherapy, age >or = 18 years, and anemia (hemoglobin < or = 11 g/dL). Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to DA 200 microg every two weeks (Q2W) or EA 40,000 units every week (QW) for up to 16 weeks with identical dose adjustment rules. Efficacy was assessed by the incidence of RBC transfusion (Kaplan-Meier estimate). The definition of noninferiority was that the upper 95% CI limit of the observed difference in RBC transfusions between groups was less than 11.5%; this noninferiority margin was based on the treatment effect observed in placebo-controlled EA studies. RESULTS: Of 1,220 patients randomly assigned, 1,209 received > or one dose of the study drug. Common tumor types were lung (26%), breast (21%), and gastrointestinal (18%). Transfusion incidence from week 5 to the end of the treatment phase (the primary end point) was 21% in the DA group and 16% in the EA group; noninferiority was concluded because the upper 95% CI limit of the difference between groups (10.8%) was below the prespecified noninferiority margin. Sensitivity analyses using alternate statistical methods and analysis sets yielded similar results. Hemoglobin, quality of life, and safety end points further support equivalency of the erythropoietic therapies. CONCLUSION: This large, phase III study demonstrates comparable efficacy of DA Q2W and EA QW. Less frequent dosing offers potential benefits for patients, caregivers and health care providers.
机译:目的:在美国,用达贝泊汀α(DA)或依泊汀α(EA)广泛治疗化学疗法诱发的贫血。这项非劣效性研究使用临床实践中常用的剂量和时间表系统地比较了DA和EA的疗效和安全性。方法:患者诊断为非髓样恶性肿瘤,计划化疗≥8周,年龄≥18岁,贫血(血红蛋白≤11 g / dL)。患者每两周(Q2W)或每周EA 40,000单位(QW)以相同的剂量调整规则1:1分配至DA 200微克,最多16周。通过RBC输血的发生率评估疗效(Kaplan-Meier估计)。非劣效性的定义是两组之间RBC输注观察到的差异的95%CI上限小于11.5%;这种非劣效性是基于在安慰剂对照的EA研究中观察到的治疗效果。结果:随机分配的1,220例患者中,有1,209例接受了≥1剂研究药物。常见的肿瘤类型是肺(26%),乳腺(21%)和胃肠道(18%)。从第5周到治疗阶段结束(主要终点)的输血发生率,DA组为21%,EA组为16%。得出非劣效性的结论是,两组间差异的95%CI上限(10.8%)低于预先规定的非劣效性余量。使用其他统计方法和分析集进行的敏感性分析得出相似的结果。血红蛋白,生活质量和安全终点进一步支持红细胞生成疗法的等效性。结论:这项大型的III期研究表明DA Q2W和EA QW具有可比的疗效。减少频繁的剂量给患者,护理人员和卫生保健提供者带来潜在的好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号