首页> 外文期刊>Clinical biomechanics >Height restoration and maintenance after treating unstable osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures by cement augmentation is dependent on the cement volume used
【24h】

Height restoration and maintenance after treating unstable osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures by cement augmentation is dependent on the cement volume used

机译:通过水泥增强治疗不稳定的骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折后的高度恢复和维持取决于所用的水泥量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Two different procedures, used for percutaneous augmentation of vertebral compression fractures were compared, with respect to height restoration and maintenance after cyclic loading. Additionally the impact of the cement volume used was investigated. Methods Wedge compression fractures were created in 36 human cadavaric vertebrae (T10-L3). Twenty-seven vertebrae were treated with the SpineJack? with different cement volumes (maximum, intermediate, and no cement), and 9 vertebrae were treated with Balloon Kyphoplasty. Vertebral heights were measured pre- and postfracture as well as after treatment and loading. Cyclic loading was performed with 10,000 cycles (1 Hz, 100-600 N). Findings The average anterior height after restoration was 85.56% for Kyphoplasty; 96.20% for SpineJack? no cement; 93.44% for SpineJack? maximum and 96% for the SpineJack? intermediate group. The average central height after restoration was 93.89% for Kyphoplasty; 100.20% for SpineJack? no cement; 99.56% for SpineJack? maximum and 101.13% for the SpineJack? intermediate group. The average anterior height after cyclic loading was 85.33 % for Kyphoplasty; 87.30% in the SpineJack? no cement, 92% in the SpineJack? maximum and 87% in the SpineJack? intermediate group. The average central height after cyclic loading was 92% for Kyphoplasty; 93.80% in the SpineJack? no cement; 98.56% in the SpineJack? maximum and 94.25% in the SpineJack? intermediate group. Interpretation Height restoration was significantly better for the SpineJack? group compared to Kyphoplasty. Height maintenance was dependent on the cement volume used. The group with the SpineJack? without cement nevertheless showed better results in height maintenance, yet the statistical significance could not be demonstrated.
机译:背景比较了两种不同的经皮椎体压缩椎体压缩骨折的方法,它们在循环载荷后的高度恢复和维持方面均得到了比较。另外,研究了水泥用量的影响。方法在36例人体椎体T10-L3中创建楔形压迫性骨折。 SpineJack治疗了27个椎骨?分别用不同的水泥体积(最大,中度和无水泥)和9个椎骨进行球囊后凸成形术。在骨折前后以及治疗和负荷后测量椎高。以10,000个循环(1Hz,100-600N)进行循环加载。结果:后凸成形术的平均前高度为85.56%。 SpineJack的96.20%?没有水泥; SpineJack的93.44%? SpineJack最多可以有96%?中间组。后凸成形术的平均中心高度为93.89%。 SpineJack的100.20%?没有水泥; SpineJack的99.56%? SpineJack最多可以得到101.13%?中间组。后凸成形术在循环负荷后的平均前高度为85.33%。 SpineJack的87.30%?没有水泥,在SpineJack中占92%? SpineJack中最多可以有87%?中间组。后凸成形术在循环载荷后的平均中心高度为92%。 SpineJack的93.80%?没有水泥; SpineJack中的98.56%? SpineJack中最大和94.25%?中间组。解释对于SpineJack,身高恢复明显更好?组与后凸成形术相比。高度保持取决于所使用的水泥量。与SpineJack一起的小组?然而,没有水泥在保持高度方面显示出更好的结果,但统计意义无法得到证实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号