首页> 外文期刊>Clinical biomechanics >The biomechanical effects of osteoporosis vertebral augmentation with cancellous bone granules or bone cement on treated and adjacent non-treated vertebral bodies: a finite element evaluation.
【24h】

The biomechanical effects of osteoporosis vertebral augmentation with cancellous bone granules or bone cement on treated and adjacent non-treated vertebral bodies: a finite element evaluation.

机译:松质骨颗粒或骨水泥对骨质疏松症椎体的生物力学作用对处理过的和邻近的未处理椎体:有限元评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: In order to reduce the complications of bone cement, many efforts are underway to replace bone cement augmentation with cancellous bone granule augmentation for treating compression fractures of osteoporotic vertebral bodies. The goal of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effects of cancellous bone granule augmentation of Optimesh and polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of kyphoplasty on treated and adjacent non-treated vertebral bodies. METHODS: Three-dimensional, anatomically detailed finite element models of the L1-L2 functional spinal unit were developed on the basis of cadaver computed tomography scans. The material properties and plug forms of the L2 centrum were adapted to simulate osteoporosis, cancellous bone granule and polymethylmethacrylate augmentation. The models assumed a three-column loading configuration as the following types: compression, flexion and extension. FINDINGS: Compared with the osteoporotic model, changes in stress and strain at adjacent levels both of cancellous bone granule and polymethylmethacrylate augmentation models were minimal, but stresses/strains within the two reinforcement material plugs were modified distinctly and differently. In addition, osteoporosis and augmentation had little effect on either the axial compressive displacement of the three columns or the average disc internal pressure in all models. INTERPRETATION: Both cancellous bone granule and polymethylmethacrylate augmentation restore the total strength and stiffness level of treated vertebral bodies and benefit the reconstruction of vertebral function. Regarding the material mechanical compatibility and the biocompatibility of the treated vertebral body and reinforcement material, however, the morcelized cancellous bone is better than polymethylmethacrylate augmentation.
机译:背景:为了减少骨水泥的并发症,目前正在进行许多努力,用松质骨颗粒增强剂替代骨水泥增强剂,以治疗骨质疏松椎体的压缩性骨折。这项研究的目的是研究Optimesh的松质骨颗粒增强和后凸成形术的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯增强对治疗和邻近的椎体的生物力学作用。方法:在尸体计算机断层扫描的基础上,建立了L1-L2功能性脊柱单元的三维解剖学详细有限元模型。 L2中心的材料特性和栓塞形式适用于模拟骨质疏松症,松质骨颗粒和聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯的增强。这些模型假定三列加载配置为以下类型:压缩,弯曲和延伸。结果:与骨质疏松模型相比,松质骨颗粒和聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯增强模型在相邻水平上的应力和应变变化很小,但两个增强材料栓塞内的应力/应变却有明显不同的改变。此外,在所有模型中,骨质疏松和增大对三根柱的轴向压缩位移或平均椎间盘内压几乎没有影响。释义:松质骨颗粒和聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯的增强均可恢复经治疗椎体的总强度和刚度,并有利于椎体功能的重建。关于处理的椎体和增强材料的材料机械相容性和生物相容性,然而,松散的松质骨优于聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯的增强。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号