首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical psychopharmacology >An open-label, randomized, controlled trial of zotepine and risperidone for acutely ill, hospitalized, schizophrenic patients with symptoms of agitation
【24h】

An open-label, randomized, controlled trial of zotepine and risperidone for acutely ill, hospitalized, schizophrenic patients with symptoms of agitation

机译:唑替平和利培酮对患有躁动症状的住院急诊,精神分裂症患者的开放性,随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Acutely ill, schizophrenic patients frequently require management of agitation. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of oral zotepine and risperidone in hospitalized, acutely ill schizophrenic patients with symptoms of agitation.This was a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, flexible dosing study. Thirty-nine patients with schizophrenia (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) who met the criteria of a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score of greater than or equal to 60 points, PANSS-excitement component (EC) score of greater than or equal to 14 points, and at least 1 PANSS-EC score of greater than or equal to 4 were randomly assigned to either the zotepine or risperidone group. The primary outcome was a comparison of the change in the PANSS-EC total score from baseline to the end of the study between groups.There was no significant between-group difference in dropout rates (zotepine, 15.8% [3/19]; risperidone, 20.0% [4/20]). The mean (SD) daily dose of zotepine from baseline to study end point ranged from 127.6 (62.3) to 236.8 (74.2) mg/d; the corresponding values for risperidone ranged from 3.3 (1.6) to 4.8 (1.7) mg/d. There were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics, PANSS total score, and PANSS-EC total score between the zotepine and risperidone groups at baseline. Both groups showed significant reductions in the PANSS-EC total scores (zotepine,-10.1 [4.7], P < 0.001; risperidone,-8.0 [5.3], P < 0.001) and PANSS total scores (zotepine,-34.7 [15.8], P < 0.001; risperidone,-28.6 [14.3], P < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in PANSS-EC total score (P = 0.265) and PANSS total score (P = 0.125) changes from baseline to study end point between the 2 treatment groups. Serum uric acid and prolactin decreased more in the zotepine group than the risperidone group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.018, respectively).Zotepine seemed to be as effective as risperidone in treating hospitalized, acutely ill, schizophrenic patients with agitation, and had the advantages of lowering hyperuricemia and hyperprolactinemia. Double-blind, fixed dose studies with a larger sample size of acutely ill, schizophrenic patients with agitation are needed to confirm the study results.
机译:急性病,精神分裂症患者经常需要控制躁动。这项研究旨在比较口服唑替平和利培酮在住院的患有躁动症状的急性精神分裂症患者中的疗效,这是一个为期6周,多中心,随机,开放标签,平行组,灵活剂量的研究。符合正负综合症量表(PANSS)总分大于或等于60分,PANSS兴奋成分(EC)的标准的39例精神分裂症患者(《精神疾病诊断和统计手册》,第四版)大于或等于14分的得分,以及至少1个大于或等于4的PANSS-EC得分被随机分配到佐替平或利培酮组。主要结果是比较各组之间从基线到研究结束的PANSS-EC总评分的变化。两组之间的辍学率无显着差异(佐替平为15.8%[3/19];利培酮,20.0%[4/20])。从基线到研究终点的佐替平日平均剂量(SD)为127.6(62.3)至236.8(74.2)mg / d;利培酮的相应值范围为3.3(1.6)至4.8(1.7)mg / d。基线时,佐替平组和利培酮组之间的患者特征,PANSS总分和PANSS-EC总分在统计学上无显着差异。两组均显示PANSS-EC总分(zotepine,-10.1 [4.7],P <0.001;利培酮,-8.0 [5.3],P <0.001)和PANSS总分(zotepine,-34.7 [15.8], P <0.001;利培酮,-28.6 [14.3],P <0.001)。但是,从基线到研究终点之间,两个治疗组之间的PANSS-EC总分(P = 0.265)和PANSS总分(P = 0.125)没有显着差异。唑替平组的血清尿酸和催乳素的下降幅度高于利培酮组(分别为P <0.001和P = 0.018)。唑替平在治疗住院急症,精神分裂症和躁动患者方面与利培酮一样有效。降低高尿酸血症和高泌乳素血症的优势。需要进行双盲,固定剂量研究,并采用更大样本量的急躁,精神分裂症躁动患者进行研究,以确认研究结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号