...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical psychology >Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III inter-subtest scatter: a comparison of brain-damaged patients and normal controls.
【24h】

Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III inter-subtest scatter: a comparison of brain-damaged patients and normal controls.

机译:韦氏成人智力量表-III子间测验散布:脑损伤患者和正常对照的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study assessed the validity of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition (WAIS-III) inter-subtest scatter (as measured by the scaled score range) as an indication of cognitive impairment due to brain dysfunction. Participants were 174 individuals with documented brain damage. Means for age, education, and WAIS-III full-scale IQ were 49.19 years (SD = 15.33), 12.57 years, (SD = 2.78), and 88.45 (SD = 17.78). The scatter ranges for brain-damaged participants were compared with those of the WAIS-III standardization sample. Results indicated that the full-scale IQ is significantly correlated with amount of scatter, r(172) = .42, p < .0001, so that a definitive answer to the question requires control of full-scale IQ. In the present analyses, inter-subtest scatter among the individuals for the sample as a whole was no greater than that for persons in the standardization sample, but subtest scatter was significantly greater for participants with IQs > or = 90. This finding suggests that there may be small differences in scatter between brain-damaged persons and normal controls, but that scatter is relatively insensitive to the presence of brain damage or dysfunction. Therefore, interpretation of marked inter-subtest variability as a sign of brain damage appears unwarranted.
机译:这项研究评估了韦氏成人智力量表第三版(WAIS-III)子测验散布的有效性(通过量表的评分范围来衡量),以表明由于脑功能障碍引起的认知障碍。参与者为174名有脑损伤的个人。年龄,教育程度和WAIS-III全面智商的平均值为49.19年(SD = 15.33),12.57年(SD = 2.78)和88.45(SD = 17.78)。将脑损伤参与者的散布范围与WAIS-III标准化样本的散布范围进行了比较。结果表明,全面智商与散布量显着相关,r(172)= 0.42,p <.0001,因此,要确定该问题的答案,就必须控制全面智商。在目前的分析中,样本整体上个体间的子测验散布不大于标准化样本中个体间的测验散布,但是对于智商大于或等于90的参与者,子测验散布显着更大。可能是脑部受损的人与正常对照组之间的散布差异很小,但这种散布对脑损伤或功能障碍的存在相对不敏感。因此,没有必要将明显的受试者间变异性解释为脑损伤的迹象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号