首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chemical Education >Response to Misapplying the Periodic Law
【24h】

Response to Misapplying the Periodic Law

机译:对不当适用周期性法的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

My commentary titled "Lanthanum (La) and Actinium (Ac)Should Remain in the d-Block" (1) was intended to make clear tothose who cite Jensen (2) that placing lanthanum and actinium inthe f-block is not majority accepted or without problems. Hope-fully, this answers Jensen's question as to why I wrote this com-mentary. Also, my "commentary" was submitted and treated asa reviewed article with four reviewers selected by thisJournal, ofwhich three recommended publication as is. However it was thisJournal's editorial decision to publish the article as a commentary.Unfortunately, critics of my commentary are now under the im-pression that it was not peer reviewed and therefore incorrectlyassume or imply that its contents are my opinion only.
机译:我的评论标题为“镧(La)和Act(Ac)应该保留在d-Block中”(1)的目的是明确指出那些引用Jensen(2)的人,多数情况下不接受将镧和act放在f块中,或者没有什么问题。希望这能回答詹森关于我为什么写这篇评论的问题。另外,我的“评论”已提交,并被视为评论文章,其中有四名评论者被《本期刊》选中,其中三名被推荐发表。但是,这是本期刊的编辑决定,将其发表为评论。不幸的是,批评我的评论现在给人的印象是,该评论未经过同行评审,因此错误地假设或暗示其内容仅是我的观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号