...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chemical theory and computation: JCTC >Critical Assessment of TD-DFT for Excited States of Open-Shell Systems: I. Doublet-Doublet Transitions
【24h】

Critical Assessment of TD-DFT for Excited States of Open-Shell Systems: I. Doublet-Doublet Transitions

机译:TD-DFT对开壳系统激发态的严格评估:I. Doublet-Doublet跃迁

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A benchmark set of 11 small radicals is set up to assess the performance of time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) for the excited states of open-shell systems. Both the unrestricted (U-TD-DFT) and spin-adapted (X-TDDFT) formulations of TD-DFT are considered. For comparison, the well-established EOM-CCSD (equation-ofmotion coupled-cluster with singles and doubles) is also used. In total, 111 low-lying singly excited doublet states are accessed by all the three approaches. Taking the MRCISD+Q (multireference configuration interaction with singles and doubles plus the Davidson correction) results as the benchmark, it is found that both U-TD-DFT and EOM-CCSD perform well for those states dominated by singlet-coupled single excitations (SCSE) from closed-shell to open-shell, open-shell to vacant-shell, or closed-shell to vacant-shell orbitals. However, for those states dominated by triplet-coupled single excitations (TCSE) from closed-shell to vacant-shell orbitals, both U-TD-DFT and EOM-CCSD fail miserably due to severe spin contaminations. In contrast, X-TD-DFT provides balanced descriptions of both SCSE and TCSE. As far as the functional dependence is concerned, it is found that, when the Hartree-Fock ground state does not suffer from the instability problem, both global hybrid (GH) and range-separated hybrid (RSH) functionals perform grossly better than pure density functionals, especially for Rydberg and charge-transfer excitations. However, if the Hartree-Fock ground state is instable or nearly instable, GH and RSH tend to underestimate severely the excitation energies. The SAOP (statistically averaging of model orbital potentials) performs more uniformly than any other density functionals, although it generally overestimates the excitation energies of valence excitations. Not surprisingly, both EOM-CCSD and adiabatic TD-DFT are incapable of describing excited states with substantial double excitation characters.
机译:建立了一个由11个小自由基组成的基准集,以评估随时间变化的密度泛函理论(TD-DFT)对于开壳系统激发态的性能。 TD-DFT的无限制(U-TD-DFT)和自旋适应(X-TDDFT)配方均被考虑。为了进行比较,还使用了完善的EOM-CCSD(具有单打和双打的等式-运动耦合群集)。三种方法总共访问111个低地单激发双峰态。以MRCISD + Q(单参考和双参考以及戴维森校正的多参考配置相互作用)结果为基准,发现U-TD-DFT和EOM-CCSD在以单重耦合单激发为主的那些状态下均表现良好( SCSE),从封闭壳到开放壳,从开放壳到空壳,或者从封闭壳到空壳轨道。但是,对于那些由三重耦合单激发(TCSE)从封闭壳到空壳轨道占主导的状态,由于严重的自旋污染,U-TD-DFT和EOM-CCSD都惨败。相反,X-TD-DFT提供了SCSE和TCSE的均衡描述。就功能依赖性而言,发现当Hartree-Fock基态不遭受不稳定性问题影响时,全局混合(GH)和距离分隔混合(RSH)的功能都比纯密度更好功能,特别是对于Rydberg和电荷转移激发。但是,如果Hartree-Fock基态不稳定或几乎不稳定,则GH和RSH会严重低估激励能量。尽管SAOP(高估了模型轨道电势的平均值)通常会高估价态激发的激发能,但它的表现要比其他任何密度泛函更为均匀。毫不奇怪,EOM-CCSD和绝热TD-DFT都无法描述具有实质双激发特征的激发态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号