...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chemical theory and computation: JCTC >CuNO_2 and Cu~+ NO_2 Revisited:A Comparative ab Initio and DFT Study
【24h】

CuNO_2 and Cu~+ NO_2 Revisited:A Comparative ab Initio and DFT Study

机译:重审CuNO_2和Cu〜+ NO_2:从头算和DFT的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We have reinvestigated CuNO_2 and Cu~+NO_2 at ab initio as well as at pure and hybrid DFT levels of approximation employing large ANO basis sets.The systems were fully optimized using the CCSD(T),QCISD(T),BPW91,PBE,PBE0,and B3LYP methods.Several stationary points (minima and transition structures) were found on the related potential energy surfaces (PES).The C_(2v) bidentate eta~2-O,O isomer is calculated to be the most stable species on the CUNO_2 PES,followed by two monodentate isomers-the C_s eta~1-O and C_(2v) eta~1-N species which are higher in energy by 12 and 14 kcal/mol,respectively,at CCSD(T)/Basis-ll (where Basis-ll is 21s15p10d6f4g/8s7p5d3f2g for Cu;14s9p4d3f/5s4p3d2f for O and N).On the Cu~+NO_2 PES,the C_s monodentate eta~1-O trans (0 kcal/mol) and cis (+3 kcal/mol at CCSD(T)/Basis-ll) isomers are found,followed by the C_(2v) monodentate eta~1-N isomer (+14 kcal/mol at CCSD/Basis-II).In contrast to the pure DFT,the hybrid DFT methods perform reasonably well for predicting the relative stabilities (except for eta~1-N of CuNO_2) and structures;however,their predictions of the bond dissociation energies are less reliable (for CuNO_2 the difference is as much as 10 kcal/mol compared to the CCSD(T) values).The performance of the QCISD(T) method was analyzed,and,furthermore,the issue of symmetry breaking was investigated.
机译:我们已经使用大型ANO基集从头开始以及在纯DFT和混合DFT近似水平上对CuNO_2和Cu〜+ NO_2进行了重新研究。系统使用CCSD(T),QCISD(T),BPW91,PBE, PBE0和B3LYP方法。在相关的势能面(PES)上找到了几个固定点(最小和过渡结构)。计算得出C_(2v)双齿eta〜2-O,O异构体是最稳定的物种CUNO_2 PES,其后是两种单齿异构体-C_s eta〜1-O和C_(2v)eta〜1-N物种,分别以CCSD(T)/ Basis为基准,其能量分别高12和14 kcal / mol -ll(其中Ba-ll对于Cu为21s15p10d6f4g / 8s7p5d3f2g;对于O和N为14s9p4d3f / 5s4p3d2f)。在Cu〜+ NO_2 PES上,C_s单齿eta〜1-O反式(0 kcal / mol)和顺式(+在CCSD(T)/ Basis-II处发现3 kcal / mol异构体,然后是C_(2v)单齿eta〜1-N异构体(在CCSD / Basis-II处为+14 kcal / mol)。纯DFT,混合DFT方法在预测方面表现良好相对稳定性(CuNO_2的η〜1-N除外)和结构;但是,他们对键解离能的预测不太可靠(对于CuNO_2,与CCSD(T)值相比,差异高达10 kcal / mol )。分析了QCISD(T)方法的性能,并进一步研究了对称破坏的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号