首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism: Official Journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism >Dynamic cerebral autoregulation following acute ischaemic stroke: Comparison of transcranial Doppler and magnetic resonance imaging techniques
【24h】

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation following acute ischaemic stroke: Comparison of transcranial Doppler and magnetic resonance imaging techniques

机译:急性缺血性脑卒中后动态脑自动调节:经颅多普勒和磁共振成像技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Novel MRI-based dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) assessment enables the estimation of both global and spatially discriminated autoregulation index values. Before exploring this technique for the evaluation of focal dCA in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients, it is necessary to compare global dCA estimates made using both TCD and MRI. Both techniques were used to study 11 AIS patients within 48 h of symptom onset, and nine healthy controls. dCA was assessed by the rate of return of CBFV (R-turn) following a sudden drop induced by the thigh cuff manoeuvre. No significant between-hemisphere differences were seen in controls using either the TCD or MRI technique. Inter-hemisphere averaged Rturn values were not different between TCD (1.89 +/- 0.67%/s) and MRI (2.07 +/- 0.60%/s) either. In patients, there were no differences between the affected and unaffected hemispheres whether assessed by TCD (R-turn 0.67 +/- 0.72 vs. 0.98 +/- 1.09%/s) or MRI (0.55 +/- 1.51 vs. 1.63 +/- 0.63%/s). Rturn for both TCD and MRI was impaired in AIS patients compared to controls in both unaffected and affected hemispheres (ANOVA, p = 0.00005). These findings pave the way for wider use of MRI for dCA assessment in health and disease.
机译:新型的基于MRI的动态脑自动调节(dCA)评估可以估算整体和空间上可分辨的自动调节指数值。在探索该技术评估急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者局灶性dCA之前,有必要比较使用TCD和MRI进行的总体dCA估计。两种技术均用于研究症状发作48小时内的11名AIS患者和9名健康对照。 dCA通过大腿袖带动作突然下降后CBFV的返回率(R型)来评估。使用TCD或MRI技术的对照组中均未见明显的半球间差异。半球间平均Rturn值在TCD(1.89 +/- 0.67%/ s)和MRI(2.07 +/- 0.60%/ s)之间也没有差异。在患者中,无论是通过TCD(R-turn 0.67 +/- 0.72 vs. 0.98 +/- 1.09%/ s)还是MRI(0.55 +/- 1.51 vs. 1.63 + /)评估,患侧和未患半球之间没有差异。 -0.63%/ s)。与未受影响和受影响的半球的对照组相比,AIS患者的TCD和MRI的Rturn均受损(ANOVA,p = 0.00005)。这些发现为在健康和疾病中将MRI广泛用于dCA评估铺平了道路。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号