...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Outcome of invasive electrophysiological procedures and gender: are males and females the same?
【24h】

Outcome of invasive electrophysiological procedures and gender: are males and females the same?

机译:侵入性电生理程序的结果和性别:男性和女性相同吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence on gender-related differences in outcome of invasive electrophysiological procedures. Gender exerts significant influences on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical presentation of many cardiac rhythm disorders. Women with supraventricular arrhythmias have a higher incidence of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, a lower prevalence of atrioventricular accessory pathways, and increased arrhythmia inducibility during luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. Catheter ablation of supraventricular arrhythmias appears equally effective in the 2 genders, although women present to catheter ablation later, with more symptoms, and after having failed more antiarrhythmic drugs. The outcome of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in women has been reported worse than in men, which may be explained by a later referral. Accordingly, women present to catheter ablation with a higher incidence of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Of note, the outcome of catheter ablation of atrial flutter does not seem to differ between genders. To date, with regard to ventricular arrhythmias, no gender-related differences in outcome of catheter ablation procedures have been reported. However, pathophysiology and risk factors underlying ventricular arrhythmias appear different in the two genders. Severe left ventricular dysfunction does not perform equally as a predictor for sudden cardiac death in women as compared to men, and the survival benefit of prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in women is inconclusive. On the other hand, the clinical outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy seems to be more favorable in women, who experience a greater degree of reverse left ventricular remodeling.
机译:这篇综述的目的是总结关于侵入性电生理程序结果中性别相关差异的现有证据。性别对许多心律失常的流行病学,病理生理学和临床表现产生重大影响。室上性心律失常的女性发生房室结折返性心动过速的发生率较高,房室辅助途径的患病率较低,在月经周期的黄体期心律失常的诱导性增加。室上性心律失常的导管消融在这两种性别中似乎同样有效,尽管女性较晚出现导管消融,出现更多症状,并且在使用更多的抗心律不齐药物后出现了消融。据报道,女性导管房颤消融的结果比男性差,这可能由以后的转诊来解释。因此,女性出现导管消融的机会更高,长期持续性房颤发生率更高。值得注意的是,房扑导管消融的结果似乎在性别之间没有差异。迄今为止,关于室性心律失常,尚未见导管消融手术结果与性别相关的差异。然而,这两种性别的室性心律失常的病理生理学和危险因素似乎有所不同。与男性相比,严重的左心功能不全不能作为女性心源性猝死的预测指标,并且预防性植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)植入对女性的生存益处尚无定论。另一方面,心脏再同步治疗后的临床结果似乎对左室重构逆转程度较高的女性更有利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号