...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Surface Atrial Frequency Analysis in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation:
【24h】

Surface Atrial Frequency Analysis in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation:

机译:心房颤动患者的表面心房频率分析:

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Atrial Fibrillation Frequency Analysis. Introduction: The aims of this study were to evaluate (1) principal component analysis as a technique for extracting the atrial signal waveform from the standard 12-lead ECG and (2) its ability to distinguish changes in atrial fibrillation (AF) frequency parameters over time and in response to pharmacologic manipulation using drugs with different effects on atrial electrophysiology. Methods and Results: Twenty patients with persistent AF were studied. Continuous 12-lead Holter ECGs were recorded for 60 minutes, first, in the drug-free state. Mean and variability of atrial waveform frequency were measured using an automated computer technique. This extracted the atrial signal by principal component analysis and identified the main frequency component using Fourier analysis. Patients were then allotted sequentially to receive 1 of 4 drugs intravenously (amiodarone, flecainide, sotalol, or metoprolol), and changes induced in mean and variability of atrial waveform frequency measured. Mean and variability of atrial waveform frequency did not differ within patients between the two 30-minute sections of the drug-free state. As hypothesized, significant changes in mean and variability of atrial waveform frequency were detected after manipulation with amiodarone (mean: 5.77 vs 4.86 Hz; variability: 0.55 vs 0.31 Hz), flecainide (mean: 5.33 vs 4.72 Hz; variability: 0.71 vs 0.31 Hz), and sotalol (mean: 5.94 vs 4.90 Hz; variability: 0.73 vs 0.40 Hz) but not with metoprolol (mean: 5.41 vs 5.17 Hz; variability: 0.81 vs 0.82 Hz). Conclusion: A technique for continuously analyzing atrial frequency characteristics of AF from the surface ECG has been developed and validated. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 15, pp. 1-6, September 2004)
机译:心房颤动频率分析。简介:这项研究的目的是评估(1)主成分分析作为一种从标准12导联心电图中提取心房信号波形的技术,以及(2)区分房颤(AF)频率参数变化的能力。时间和使用对心房电生理有不同影响的药物对药理操作的响应。方法和结果:研究了20例持续性AF患者。连续60分钟记录连续12导Holter心电图,首先是无药状态。使用自动计算机技术测量心房波形频率的均值和变异性。通过主成分分析提取心房信号,并使用傅立叶分析确定主频率成分。然后依次分配患者以静脉内接受4种药物中的1种(胺碘酮,氟卡尼,索他洛尔或美托洛尔),并测量平均和心房波形频率变化引起的变化。在两个无药状态的30分钟部分之间,患者内心房波形频率的均值和变异性没有差异。如假设的那样,使用胺碘酮(平均值:5.77 vs 4.86 Hz;变异性:0.55 vs 0.31 Hz),氟卡尼(平均值:5.33 vs 4.72 Hz;变异性:0.71 vs 0.31 Hz)后,发现心房波形频率的均值和变异性有显着变化)和索他洛尔(平均值:5.94 vs 4.90 Hz;变异性:0.73 vs 0.40 Hz),但对美托洛尔则不适用(平均值:5.41 vs 5.17 Hz;变异性:0.81 vs 0.82 Hz)。结论:已开发并验证了一种用于从表面心电图连续分析房颤心房频率特征的技术。 (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,第15卷,第1-6页,2004年9月)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号