...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of child psychology and psychiatry >Commentary: ADHD and social disadvantage: An inconvenient truth? - A reflection on Russell et al. () and Larsson et al. ()
【24h】

Commentary: ADHD and social disadvantage: An inconvenient truth? - A reflection on Russell et al. () and Larsson et al. ()

机译:评论:多动症和社会劣势:一个不便的事实吗? -对罗素(Russell)等人的反思。 ()和Larsson等。 ()

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the 1950s, many experts believed hyperkinesis was a neurotic reaction to inner conflicts arising from early family experiences. In the 1990s, many experts believed ADHD to be 'genetic' (without a mechanistic explanation of what that meant). Both views appear naive today in a scientific world grappling with the complexity of highly plastic gene expression, gene x environment interplay, and epi-genetic, context-dependent emergence of psychopa-thology. Both views also fail to account for the uncomfortable fact that ADHD is also associated with social disadvantage - a level of analysis required in a developmental psychopathology approach.
机译:在1950年代,许多专家认为运动过度是对早期家庭经历引起的内部冲突的神经反应。在1990年代,许多专家认为多动症是“遗传性的”(没有机械的解释这意味着什么)。在高度复杂的基因表达,基因与环境之间的相互作用以及表观遗传的,与情境有关的精神病学理论的复杂性方面,两种观点在当今的科学世界中显得天真。两种观点都未能解释令人不安的事实,即多动症也与社会劣势有关-这是发展心理病理学方法所要求的分析水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号