...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography >Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial comparing stress myocardial perfusion imaging with coronary CT angiography as the initial imaging study for intermediate-risk patients admitted with chest pain.
【24h】

Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial comparing stress myocardial perfusion imaging with coronary CT angiography as the initial imaging study for intermediate-risk patients admitted with chest pain.

机译:比较应激心肌灌注显像与冠状动脉CT血管造影的随机对照试验的原理和设计,作为初发影像学研究用于中度风险的胸痛患者。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive cardiac imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease (CAD). Prior studies have focused on the diagnostic performance of noninvasive modalities using angiographically significant stenoses as the reference standard. Recent trends in evidence-based medicine and increasing imaging utilization call for validation of diagnostic algorithms with well-designed, controlled trials with clinical outcome endpoints. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) in terms of outcomes. METHODS: We designed a single-center, randomized controlled trial that compares MPI and CTA as the initial modality for the evaluation of patients hospitalized for chest pain without known CAD or acute myocardial infarction. Patients with intermediate-risk characteristics and a clinical need for noninvasive imaging are included. The primary outcome measured is the incidence of conventional angiography not leading to subsequent coronary revascularization within 1 year. The study is powered to detect a reduction from 11% to 3% in catheterization not leading to an intervention with a sample size of 400. Secondary outcomes include procedural complications and posttest renal dysfunction (safety outcomes), major adverse cardiovascular events, length of hospital stay, subsequent hospitalizations and imaging, changes in medical management, and tolerability of the noninvasive test. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this trial will further our understanding of the relative appropriateness of CTA and MPI in evaluating intermediate-risk patients hospitalized with chest pain. It will also have implications for the design and probability of success of multicentered trials that are currently being planned.
机译:背景:无创心脏成像在冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的诊断和管理中起着重要作用。先前的研究集中在使用血管造影显着性狭窄作为参考标准的无创模式的诊断性能上。循证医学的最新趋势和成像利用率的提高要求通过设计合理,具有临床结果终点的对照试验来验证诊断算法。目的:比较结局方面的放射性核素心肌灌注成像(MPI)和冠状动脉计算机断层造影血管造影(CTA)的性能。方法:我们设计了一项单中心,随机对照试验,比较了MPI和CTA作为评估住院无已知CAD或急性心肌梗塞胸痛患者的初始方式。包括具有中危特征且无创成像的临床需求的患者。测得的主要结果是常规血管造影的发生率在1年内未导致随后的冠状动脉血运重建。这项研究能够检测出导管插入术从11%减少到3%而不导致干预的样本量为400。次要结果包括程序并发症和测试后肾功能不全(安全性结果),主要的不良心血管事件,住院时间住院,随后的住院和影像检查,医疗管理的变化以及无创检查的耐受性。结论:该试验的结果将使我们进一步了解CTA和MPI在评估住院胸痛的中危患者中的相对适用性。这也将对目前正在计划的多中心试验的设计和成功可能性产生影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号