...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical infectious diseases >Cost-effective screening for acute hepatitis C virus infection in hiv-infected men who have sex with men
【24h】

Cost-effective screening for acute hepatitis C virus infection in hiv-infected men who have sex with men

机译:具有成本效益的筛查艾滋病毒感染男性男同性恋者的急性丙型肝炎病毒感染

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. We used a Monte Carlo computer simulation to estimate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected men who have sex with men. Methods. One-time screening for prevalent HCV infection was performed at the time of enrollment in care, followed by either symptom-based screening, screening with liver function tests (LFTs), HCV antibody (Ab) screening, or HCV RNA screening in various combinations and intervals. We considered both treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PEG/RBV) alone and with an HCV protease inhibitor. Outcome measures were life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, direct medical costs, and cost-effectiveness, assuming a societal willingness to pay $100 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.Results.All strategies increased life expectancy (from 0.49 to 0.94 life-months), quality-adjusted life expectancy (from 0.47 to 1.00 quality-adjusted life-months), and costs (from $1900 to $7600), compared with symptom-based screening. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of screening with 6-month LFTs and a 12-month HCV Ab test, compared with symptom-based screening, was $43 700/QALY (for PEG/RBV alone) and $57 800/QALY (for PEG/RBV plus HCV protease inhibitor). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of screening with 3-month LFTs, compared with 6-month LFTs plus a 12-month HCV Ab test, was $129 700/QALY (for PEG/RBV alone) and $229 900/QALY (for PEG/RBV plus HCV protease inhibitor). With HCV protease inhibitor-based therapy, screening with 6-month LFTs and a 12-month HCV Ab test was the optimal strategy when the HCV infection incidence was ≤1.25 cases/100 person-years. The 3-month LFT strategy was optimal when the incidence was >1.25 cases/100 person-years. Conclusions. Screening for acute HCV infection in HIV-infected MSM prolongs life expectancy and is cost-effective. Depending on incidence, regular screening with LFTs, with or without an HCV Ab test, is the optimal strategy.
机译:背景。我们使用蒙特卡洛计算机模拟来评估筛查在人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染的男性患者中感染急性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的有效性和成本效益。方法。在就诊时对流行的HCV感染进行了一次筛查,随后进行了基于症状的筛查,肝功能检查(LFT)筛查,HCV抗体(Ab)筛查或HCV RNA筛查的各种组合,间隔。我们考虑了单独使用聚乙二醇化干扰素和利巴韦林(PEG / RBV)以及使用HCV蛋白酶抑制剂进行的治疗。结果衡量是预期寿命,质量调整后的预期寿命,直接医疗费用和成本效益,假设社会愿意为每个获得质量调整后的生命年(QALY)支付$ 100,000的结果。与基于症状的筛查相比,质量调整后的预期寿命(从0.47到1.00质量调整后的生命月)从0.47到0.94生命月(从0.47到1.00质量调整后的生命月)和成本(从$ 1900到$ 7600)。与基于症状的筛查相比,使用6个月的LFT和12个月的HCV Ab试验进行筛查的成本效益比增加为$ 43 700 / QALY(仅针对PEG / RBV)和$ 57 800 / QALY(对于PEG / RBV加HCV蛋白酶抑制剂)。与6个月LFT加12个月HCV Ab测试相比,进行3个月LFT筛查的成本效益比为129 700 / QALY(仅针对PEG / RBV)和229 900 / QALY(对PEG / RBV)。 RBV加HCV蛋白酶抑制剂)。采用HCV蛋白酶抑制剂治疗时,当HCV感染发生率≤1.25例/ 100人年时,采用6个月LFT和12个月HCV Ab试验进行筛查是最佳策略。当发生率> 1.25例/ 100人年时,三个月的LFT策略是最佳的。结论在HIV感染的MSM中筛查急性HCV感染可延长预期寿命,并且具有成本效益。根据发生率,使用或不使用HCV Ab测试的LFT进行定期筛查是最佳策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号