首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia >Comparison of pulmonary complications in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus open aortic valve replacement
【24h】

Comparison of pulmonary complications in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus open aortic valve replacement

机译:经导管主动脉瓣植入术与开腹主动脉瓣置换术患者肺部并发症的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the differences in postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement by open repair (OAVR) versus those undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation by the transapical approach (TAVI-A) or transfemoral approach (TAVI-F). Design A retrospective review of data from aortic valve replacement patients. Setting A private, non-profit hospital. Participants Thirty patients with severe aortic stenosis requiring surgical replacement. Interventions Data collected from TAVI-F, TAVI-A, and OAVR patient charts. Materials and Methods Patients were divided into 3 groups: 10 patients undergoing OAVR, 10 patients undergoing TAVI-F, and 10 patients undergoing TAVI-A. Pulmonary complications and length of stay were recorded and analyzed. The TAVI-F group had the lowest number of total pulmonary complications per patient (1.0±0.667) compared to the OAVR group (1.8±0.789, p = 0.04) and TAVI-A group (2.0±1.054, p = 0.02). The most frequent complication was atelectasis. TAVI-F patients spent the least amount of time on the ventilator (TAVI-F median 2.6, IQR 4.8 h, TAVI-A median 4.9, IQR 7.6 h, and OAVR median 6.6, IQR 17.3 h, p = 0.02) and were discharged in half the time of the other groups (TAVI-F median 3.2, IQR 1.3 days, TAVI-A median 5.6, IQR 3.5 days, OAVR median 6.1, IQR 4.6 days, p = 0.008). Conclusions Due to the high incidence of multiple comorbidities and increased age, it is important to take into consideration the risk of pulmonary complications when choosing the surgical and anesthetic approach to TAVI in this high-risk group of patients.
机译:目的本研究的目的是调查并比较经开腹修补术(OAVR)和经经心尖入路(TAVI-A)或经股动脉入路(TAVI)行经导管主动脉瓣膜植入术的患者术后肺部并发症的差异-F)。设计回顾性分析来自主动脉瓣置换患者的数据。设立私立非营利医院。参与者30例患有严重主动脉瓣狭窄的患者需要进行手术置换。干预措施从TAVI-F,TAVI-A和OAVR患者图表收集的数据。材料与方法将患者分为3组:10例行OAVR,10例行TAVI-F,10例行TAVI-A。记录并分析肺部并发症和住院时间。与OAVR组(1.8±0.789,p = 0.04)和TAVI-A组(2.0±1.054,p = 0.02)相比,TAVI-F组每例患者的总肺部并发症最低(1.0±0.667)。最常见的并发症是肺不张。 TAVI-F患者在呼吸机上花费的时间最少(TAVI-F中位数2.6,IQR 4.8 h,TAVI-A中位数4.9,IQR 7.6 h和OAVR中位数6.6,IQR 17.3 h,p = 0.02),并且出院其他时间的一半(TAVI-F中位数3.2,IQR 1.3天,TAVI-A中位数5.6,IQR 3.5天,OAVR中位数6.1,IQR 4.6天,p = 0.008)。结论由于多种合并症的高发和年龄增加,在这种高风险患者中选择手术和麻醉方式治疗TAVI时,必须考虑肺部并发症的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号