首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiac failure >The influence of renal function on clinical outcome and response to beta-blockade in systolic heart failure: insights from Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention Trial in Chronic HF (MERIT-HF).
【24h】

The influence of renal function on clinical outcome and response to beta-blockade in systolic heart failure: insights from Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention Trial in Chronic HF (MERIT-HF).

机译:收缩期心力衰竭中肾功能对临床结局和对β受体阻滞反应的影响:美托洛尔CR / XL慢性HF(MERIT-HF)随机干预试验的见解。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on the risk and impact of renal dysfunction on the response to beta-blockade and mode of death in systolic heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Renal function was estimated with glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. Patients from the Metoprolol CR/XL Controlled Randomized Intervention Trial in Chronic HF (MERIT-HF) were divided into 3 renal function subgroups (MDRD formula): eGFR(MDRD) > 60 (n = 2496), eGFR(MDRD) 45 to 60 (n = 976), and eGFR(MDRD) < 45 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) body surface area (n = 493). Hazard ratio (HR) was estimated with Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for prespecified risk factors. Placebo patients with eGFR < 45 had significantly higher risk than those with eGFR > 60: HR for all-cause mortality, 1.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28 to 2.81) comparing placebo patients with eGFR < 45 and eGFR > 60, and for the combined end point of all-cause mortality/hospitalization for worsening HF (time to first event): HR, 1.91 (95% CI, 1.44 to 2.53). No significant increase in risk with deceased renal function was observed for those randomized to metoprolol controlled release (CR)/extended release (XL) due to a highly significant decrease in risk on metoprolol CR/XL in those with eGFR < 45. For total mortality, metoprolol CR/XL vs placebo: HR, 0.41 (95% CI. 0.25 to 0.68; P < .001) in those with eGFR < 45 compared with HR, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.95; P < .021) for those with eGFR > 60; corresponding data for the combined end point was HR, 0.44 (95% CI, 0.31 to 0.63; P < .0001) and HR, 0.75 (0.62 to 0.92; P = .005, respectively; P = .095 for interaction by treatment for total mortality; P = .011 for combined end point). Metoprolol CR/XL was well tolerated in all 3 renal function subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Renal function as estimated by eGFR was a powerful predictor of death and hospitalizations from worsening HF. Metoprolol CR/XL was at least as effective in reducing death and hospitalizations for worsening HF in patients with eGFR < 45 as in those with eGFR > 60.
机译:背景:关于肾功能不全对收缩性心力衰竭(HF)的β受体阻滞反应和死亡方式的风险和影响的信息有限。方法和结果:使用简化的肾脏疾病饮食(MDRD)公式通过肾小球滤过率(eGFR)评估肾功能。将美托洛尔CR / XL对照的慢性HF随机干预试验(MERIT-HF)患者分为3个肾功能亚组(MDRD公式):eGFR(MDRD)> 60(n = 2496),eGFR(MDRD)45至60 (n = 976),并且每1.73 m(2)体表面积(n = 493)的eGFR(MDRD)<45 mL / min。风险比(HR)通过针对预先指定的风险因素调整的Cox比例风险模型进行估算。与eGFR> 60的安慰剂患者相比,eGFR> 60的安慰剂患者的全因死亡率为1.90(95%置信区间[CI]为1.28至2.81),而eGFR <45和eGFR> 60的安慰剂患者的危险性明显更高。而导致HF恶化的全因死亡率/住院综合终点(首次事件发生时间):HR,1.91(95%CI,1.44至2.53)。对于eGFR <45的患者,美托洛尔CR / XL的风险显着降低,因此随机分配至美托洛尔控释(CR)/延长释放(XL)的患者未观察到肾功能降低的风险显着增加。对于总死亡率,美托洛尔CR / XL vs安慰剂:eGFR <45的患者的HR为0.41(95%CI。0.25至0.68; P <.001),而HR为0.71(95%的CI为0.54至0.95; P <.021)对于eGFR> 60的人群;组合终点的相应数据分别为HR,0.44(95%CI,0.31至0.63; P <.0001)和HR,0.75(0.62至0.92; P = .005; P = .095,表明治疗的相互作用总死亡率;对于合并终点,P = 0.011)。美托洛尔CR / XL在所有3个肾功能亚组中均具有良好的耐受性。结论:eGFR估计肾功能是HF恶化导致死亡和住院的有力预测指标。 eGFR <45的患者与eGFR> 60的患者相比,美托洛尔CR / XL至少在减少死亡和住院恶化HF方面至少有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号