...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology: The International Journal of Theoredtical and Basic Aspects of Adhesion Science and Its Applications in All Areas of Technology >Adhesion of orthodontic brackets to indirect laboratory-processed resin composite as a function of surface conditioning methods and artificial aging
【24h】

Adhesion of orthodontic brackets to indirect laboratory-processed resin composite as a function of surface conditioning methods and artificial aging

机译:正畸托架对间接实验室处理的树脂复合材料的粘合力,取决于表面调节方法和人工时效的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study compared the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to laboratory-processed indirect resin composites (IRC) after different surface conditioning methods and aging. Specimens made of IRC (Gradia Indirect, GC) (thickness: 2 mm; diameter: 10 mm) (N = 80) were randomly assigned to one of the following surface conditioning methods: C-Control: no treatment; AA - Air-abrasion (50 mu m Al2O3 particles); DB-Diamond bur and HF - Etching with hydrofluoric acid (9.6%). After adhesive primer application (Transbond XT), orthodontic brackets were bonded to the conditioned IRC specimens using adhesive resin (Transbond XT). Following storage in artificial saliva for 24 h at 37 degrees C, the specimens were thermocycled (x1000, 5-55 degrees C). The IRC-bracket interface was loaded under shear in a Universal Testing Machine (0.5 mm/min). Failure types were classified using modified adhesive remnant index criteria. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD (alpha = 0.05). Surface conditioning method did not significantly affect the bond strength results (p = 0.2020), but aging significantly decreased the results (p = 0.04). Interaction terms were not significant (p = 0.775). In both non-aged and aged conditions, non-conditioned C group presented the lowest bond strength results (MPa) (p < 0.05). In non-aged conditions, surface conditioning with DB (8.03 +/- 0.77) and HF (7.87 +/- 0.64) showed significantly higher bond strength results compared to those of other groups (p < 0.05). Thermocycling significantly decreased the mean bond strength in all groups (2.24 +/- 0.36-6.21 +/- 0.59) (p < 0.05). The incidence of Score 5 (all adhesive resin remaining on the specimen) was the highest in HF group without (80%) and with aging (80%) followed by DB (40, 70%, respectively). C groups without and with aging showed exclusively Score 1 type (no adhesive resin on the specimen) of failures indicating the least reliable type of adhesion.
机译:这项研究比较了在不同的表面调节方法和老化后,正畸托槽与实验室加工的间接树脂复合材料(IRC)的剪切粘结强度。 IRC(Gradia Indirect,GC)制成的样品(厚度:2 mm;直径:10 mm)(N = 80)被随机分配给以下表面调节方法之一:C-Control:不进行处理; AA-空气磨损(50微米Al2O3颗粒); DB-Diamond bur和HF-用氢氟酸(9.6%)蚀刻。施加粘合剂底漆(Transbond XT)后,使用粘合剂树脂(Transbond XT)将正畸托槽粘合到条件化的IRC样品上。在37摄氏度的人造唾液中存储24小时后,将样品进行热循环(x1000,5-55摄氏度)。 IRC支架界面在万能试验机中以剪切力加载(0.5毫米/分钟)。失效类型使用改良的粘合剂残留指数标准进行分类。使用双向方差分析和Tukey HSD(alpha = 0.05)分析数据。表面调节方法对粘合强度结果没有明显影响(p = 0.2020),但老化会明显降低结果(p = 0.04)。互动条件不显着(p = 0.775)。在未老化和老化条件下,未老化C组的粘结强度结果(MPa)最低(p <0.05)。在非老化条件下,与其他组相比,用DB(8.03 +/- 0.77)和HF(7.87 +/- 0.64)进行的表面调理显示出明显更高的粘结强度结果(p <0.05)。热循环显着降低了所有组的平均粘合强度(2.24 +/- 0.36-6.21 +/- 0.59)(p <0.05)。分数5(所有残留在样品上的粘合树脂)的发生率在HF组中最高(无(80%)和有老化(80%)),其次是DB(分别为40%和70%)。没有老化和有老化的C组仅表现出Score 1类型(样品上没有粘合树脂)失败,表明粘合的最不可靠类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号