...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Brand Management >Do consumers perceive three levels of luxury? A comparison of accessible, intermediate and inaccessible luxury brands
【24h】

Do consumers perceive three levels of luxury? A comparison of accessible, intermediate and inaccessible luxury brands

机译:消费者是否会感知三个等级的奢侈品?无障碍,中级和无障碍奢侈品牌的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this article is to study the concept of luxury levels and to assess whether they are significant for consumers. Perceptions of five brands were measured: Chanel and Mont Blanc for accessible luxury level, Rolex for intermediary luxury level and Ferrari and Van Cleef & Arpels for inaccessible luxury level. Also three luxury perception scales were compared: Kapferer (1998), Vigneron and Johnson (1999) and Dubois et al (2001). Various statistical analyses are carried out in order to validate the structure of the scales and to show their discriminant validity with regard to the five luxury brands encompassed in this study. This research shows some convergences between the three scales as well as the utility of these scales for differentiating luxury brands. Finally, the predictive validity of these scales is unlighted, validating the distinction of brands among the three aforementioned luxury levels. Results also show that there is a luxury continuum at a theoretical level, reinforcing the notions of accessible, intermediate and prototypical inaccessible luxury.
机译:本文的目的是研究奢侈品级别的概念,并评估它们是否对消费者有意义。对五个品牌的感知度进行了衡量:香奈儿和勃朗峰表示可访问的奢侈品级别,劳力士表示中级奢侈品级别,法拉利和梵克雅宝表示无法访问奢侈品级别。还比较了三种豪华感知量表:Kapferer(1998),Vigneron和Johnson(1999)和Dubois等(2001)。进行了各种统计分析,以验证量表的结构并显示其对本研究中所涉及的五个奢侈品牌的区别有效性。这项研究显示了这三个量表之间的某些融合以及这些量表在区分奢侈品牌方面的效用。最后,这些量表的预测效度没有得到证实,从而验证了上述三个奢侈品等级之间品牌的区别。结果还表明,在理论层面上存在着一个奢侈品连续体,强化了可及,中间和典型的不可及奢侈品的概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号