...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical infectious diseases >Infection control or formulary control: what is the best tool to reduce nosocomial infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus? Diseases Society of America
【24h】

Infection control or formulary control: what is the best tool to reduce nosocomial infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus? Diseases Society of America

机译:感染控制或处方控制:减少耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的医院感染的最佳工具是什么?美国疾病学会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The burden of infectious disease due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has increased since MRSA was first implicated as a nosocomial pathogen 4 decades ago [1, 2]. Data from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program estimate that ~40% of S. aureus isolates recovered in intensive care units (ICUs) have been resistant to methicillin . Risk factors for nosocomial infection with MRSA include exposure to antimicrobials and cross-colonization by health care workers from colonized or infected patients or from the contaminated inanimate environment (e.g., in ICUs or burn units) [3, 4]. Control of MRSA within hospitals generally relies on proper infection-control practice, as reflected by the statement that "the rate of MRSA transmission in a hospital reflects the effectiveness of infection control practices in that facility".
机译:自从40年前MRSA首次被认为是医院病原体以来,耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)引起的传染病负担就增加了[1,2]。来自SENTRY抗菌监测计划的数据估计,在重症监护病房(ICU)中回收的金黄色葡萄球菌分离株中约有40%对甲氧西林耐药。 MRSA医院感染的危险因素包括接触抗菌药物以及医护人员从定居或感染的患者或受污染的无生命环境(例如,在ICU或烧伤病房中)进行的交叉定殖[3,4]。医院内部对MRSA的控制通常依赖于正确的感染控制措施,这一陈述反映了“医院中MRSA的传播率反映了该机构感染控制措施的有效性”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号