...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Biomechanics >Finite element modeling of endovascular coiling and flow diversion enables hemodynamic prediction of complex treatment strategies for intracranial aneurysm
【24h】

Finite element modeling of endovascular coiling and flow diversion enables hemodynamic prediction of complex treatment strategies for intracranial aneurysm

机译:血管内盘旋和血流转移的有限元建模可以对颅内动脉瘤的复杂治疗策略进行血流动力学预测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Endovascular interventions using coil embolization and flow diversion are becoming the mainstream treatment for intracranial aneurysms (IAs). To help assess the effect of intervention strategies on aneurysm hemodynamics and treatment outcome, we have developed a finite-element-method (FEM)-based technique for coil deployment along with our HiFiVS technique for flow diverter (FD) deployment in patient-specific IAs. We tested four clinical intervention strategies: coiling (1-8 coils), single FD, FD with adjunctive coils (1-8 coils), and overlapping FDs. By evaluating post-treatment hemodynamics using computational fluid dynamics (CFD), we compared the flow-modification performance of these strategies. Results show that a single FD provides more reduction in inflow rate than low packing density (PD) coiling, but less reduction in average velocity inside the aneurysm. Adjunctive coils add no additional reduction of inflow rate beyond a single FD until coil PD exceeds 11%. This suggests that the main role of FDs is to divert inflow, while that of coils is to create stasis in the aneurysm. Overlapping FDs decreases inflow rate, average velocity, and average wall shear stress (WSS) in the aneurysm sac, but adding a third FD produces minimal additional reduction. In conclusion, our FEM-based techniques for virtual coiling and flow diversion enable recapitulation of complex endovascular intervention strategies and detailed hemodynamics to identify hemodynamic factors that affect treatment outcome. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:使用线圈栓塞和血流转移的血管内干预正成为颅内动脉瘤(IAs)的主流治疗方法。为帮助评估干预策略对动脉瘤血流动力学和治疗结果的影响,我们开发了基于有限元方法(FEM)的线圈展开技术以及针对患者特定IA的HiFiVS技术用于分流器(FD)展​​开。我们测试了四种临床干预策略:盘绕(1-8个线圈),单个FD,带辅助线圈的FD(1-8个线圈)和重叠FD。通过使用计算流体动力学(CFD)评估治疗后的血液动力学,我们比较了这些策略的流程修改性能。结果表明,与低盘绕密度(PD)盘绕相比,单个FD可以提供更多的流入量减少,但动脉瘤内部平均速度的减少却较少。辅助线圈在单个FD之前不会增加流入速率的额外降低,直到线圈PD超过11%为止。这表明FD的主要作用是转移流入,而线圈的作用是在动脉瘤中形成淤滞。 FD重叠会降低动脉瘤囊的流入速率,平均速度和平均壁切应力(WSS),但增加第三个FD只会产生最小的额外减少。总之,我们基于FEM的虚拟绕线和流量转移技术可以概括复杂的血管内干预策略和详细的血液动力学,从而确定影响治疗结果的血液动力学因素。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号