...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >DEFI 2005: a randomized controlled trial of the effect of automated external defibrillator cardiopulmonary resuscitation protocol on outcome from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
【24h】

DEFI 2005: a randomized controlled trial of the effect of automated external defibrillator cardiopulmonary resuscitation protocol on outcome from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

机译:DEFI 2005:自动外部除颤器心肺复苏方案对院外心脏骤停结果的影响的随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Using automated external defibrillators (AEDs) that implement the Guidelines 2000 resuscitation protocol constrains administration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to <50% of AED connection time. We tested a different AED protocol aimed at increasing the CPR administered to patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a randomized controlled trial, patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest requiring defibrillation were treated with 1 of 2 AED protocols. In the control protocol, based on Guidelines 2000, sequences of up to 3 stacked countershocks were delivered, with rhythm analyses initially and after the first and second shocks. The study protocol featured 1 minute of CPR before the first shock, shorter CPR interruptions before and after each shock, and no stacked shocks. The primary end point was survival to hospital admission. Of 5107 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients connected to an AED, 1238 required defibrillation, and 845 were included in the final analysis. Study patients (n=421) had shorter preshock pauses (9 versus 19 seconds; P<0.001), had shorter postshock pauses (11 versus 33 seconds; P<0.001), and received more CPR (61% versus 48%; P<0.001) and fewer shocks (2.5 versus 2.9; P<0.001) than control patients (n=424). Similar proportions survived to hospital admission (43.2% versus 42.7%; P=0.87), survived to hospital discharge (13.3% versus 10.6%; P=0.19), achieved return of spontaneous circulation before physician arrival (47.0% versus 48.6%; P=0.65), and survived to 1 year (P=0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Following prompts from AEDs programmed with a protocol similar to Guidelines 2005, firefighters shortened pauses in CPR and improved overall hands-on time, but survival to hospital admission of patients with ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest did not improve. Clinical Trial Registration- http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00139542.
机译:背景:使用实施指南2000复苏方案的自动体外除颤器(AED),将心肺复苏(CPR)的管理限制在AED连接时间的50%以下。我们测试了另一种AED方案,旨在提高对院外心脏骤停患者的CPR。方法和结果:在一项随机对照试验中,需要除颤的院外心脏骤停患者接受2种AED方案中的1种治疗。在控制协议中,根据准则2000,最多交付了3个堆叠的反击序列,并在最初和第一次和第二次电击之后进行了节奏分析。研究方案的特点是:第一次电击前需进行1分钟的CPR,每次电击前后均应缩短CPR的中断时间,且无堆叠式电击。主要终点是入院生存率。在5107例与AED相连的院外心脏骤停患者中,有1238例需要除颤,而845例被纳入最终分析。研究患者(n = 421)的休克前暂停时间较短(9对19秒; P <0.001),休克后暂停时间较短(11对33秒; P <0.001),并且接受了更多的CPR(61%对48%; P < 0.001)和更少的电击(2.5比2.9; P <0.001)比对照组(n = 424)。到入院时存活的比例相似(43.2%对42.7%; P = 0.87),到出院时存活的比例(13.3%对10.6%; P = 0.19),在医师到达之前实现了自发循环的恢复(47.0%对48.6%; P = 0.65),并存活到1年(P = 0.77)。结论:按照与《 2005年指南》相似的方案编程的AED提示,消防员缩短了CPR的暂停时间,并改善了整体动手时间,但是患有室颤的院外心脏骤停患者的入院生存率没有改善。临床试验注册-http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00139542。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号