首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >Does bystander-initiated chest compressions-only result in better patient outcome than full cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? Unexpected result from a post-hoc analysis of the DEFI 2005 Trial.
【24h】

Does bystander-initiated chest compressions-only result in better patient outcome than full cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? Unexpected result from a post-hoc analysis of the DEFI 2005 Trial.

机译:对于医院外心脏骤停,由旁观者启动的胸部按压是否比完全心肺复苏(CPR)更好的患者预后?对DEFI 2005试用版进行事后分析的意外结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Definitive evidence is lacking on the survival impact of different cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) techniques. Recent studies show that compressions-only CPR by bystanders may be beneficial, especially in the five first minutes of witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In an update to the 2005 Guidelines recommendation, an AHA science advisory promoted compressions-only CPR for rescuers with insufficient training or confidence to perform CPR. We compared the outcome impact of bystander-initiated full CPR, compressions-only CPR, and no CPR in patients with ventricular fibrillation enrolled in the DEFI 2005 trial (Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00139542).
机译:缺乏关于不同心肺复苏(CPR)技术对生存的影响的确切证据。最近的研究表明,仅旁观者进行心肺复苏术可能是有益的,尤其是在目击医院外心脏骤停的前五分钟。在对2005年指南的建议进行的更新中,AHA科学咨询为那些没有足够的培训或信心来执行心肺复苏术的救援人员推广了仅压缩心肺复苏术。我们比较了参加DEFI 2005试验的室颤患者的旁观者启动的完全CPR,仅按压CPR和无CPR对结果的影响(Clinicaltrials.gov,NCT00139542)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号