首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods >Pre-clinical methods for the determination of insulin sensitivity.
【24h】

Pre-clinical methods for the determination of insulin sensitivity.

机译:临床前测定胰岛素敏感性的方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We compared the hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic glucose clamping (HEGC) procedure and the rapid insulin sensitivity test (RIST) to characterize insulin sensitivity in anaesthetized rats. The changes in insulin sensitivity were then supplemented with the direct measurement of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake using tissue accumulation of radioactive 2-deoxyglucose in skeletal muscle samples obtained from animals undergone either procedure. Studies of the recently described endogenous insulin sensitizer mechanism termed hepatic insulin sensitizing (HISS) mechanism, by the two methods yielded data for evaluation. The HISS mechanism is defined as an increase in tissue insulin sensitivity in response to post-prandial hepatic release of an undefined substance through a nitrergic pathway. For the HEGC method, insulin was infused to attain a stable plasma insulin immunoreactivity of 100 muU/ml determined by radioimmunoassay, whereas with the RIST method the HISS mechanism was activated by a 50 mg/kg i.v. insulinbolus. Euglycaemia was kept constant by means of glucose infusion. With the HEGC and the RIST methods, insulin sensitivity was defined as the average rate of glucose infusion and the amount of glucose/kg body weight/40 min (RIST index) infused to maintain euglycaemia and preinvestigation blood glucose level, respectively. During HEGC 16+/-4.2 mg/kg/min glucose was able to maintain euglycaemia, which decreased to 8+/-2.9 (p<0.05) after administration of 10 mg/kg N(G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME) (i.p.), a NO synthase inhibitor. Conversely, the RIST index decreased by 55+/-6.9% (p<0.05) after l-NAME. Similarly, 2-deoxyglucose uptake by the gastrocnemius muscle was decreased by 49.9+/-5.8 (p<0.05) and 52.3+/-7.4% (p<0.05) with the HEGC and the RIST methods, respectively. The results show that both the HEGC and the RIST methods supplemented with tissue radioactive 2-deoxyglucose uptake determinations are appropriate methods to characterize the alteration of insulin sensitivity in context of the HISS mechanism.
机译:我们比较了高胰岛素正常血糖钳制(HEGC)程序和快速胰岛素敏感性测试(RIST)来表征麻醉大鼠的胰岛素敏感性。然后,使用从接受过上述两种方法的动物得到的骨骼肌样品中放射性2-脱氧葡萄糖的组织积累,直接测量胰岛素刺激的葡萄糖摄取,从而补充胰岛素敏感性的变化。通过两种方法对最近描述的内源性胰岛素增敏剂机制(称为肝胰岛素增敏(HISS)机理)的研究产生了用于评估的数据。 HISS机制被定义为响应于餐后肝脏通过硝化途径释放未定义物质而引起的组织胰岛素敏感性的增加。对于HEGC法,通过放射免疫测定法注入胰岛素以达到稳定的100μU/ ml的血浆胰岛素免疫反应性,而使用RIST法,通过50mg / kg i.v激活HIS机制。胰岛素通过葡萄糖输注使血糖保持恒定。使用HEGC和RIST方法,胰岛素敏感性分别定义为平均葡萄糖输注速率和输注以维持正常血糖和研究前血糖水平的葡萄糖/千克体重/ 40分钟(RIST指数)。在HEGC期间,16 +/- 4.2 mg / kg / min的葡萄糖能够维持正常血糖,在施用10 mg / kg N(G)-硝基-1-精氨酸甲基之后,血糖降至8 +/- 2.9(p <0.05)酯(l-NAME)(ip),NO合酶抑制剂。相反,I-NAME后RIST指数下降了55 +/- 6.9%(p <0.05)。同样,使用HEGC和RIST方法,腓肠肌对2-脱氧葡萄糖的摄取分别降低了49.9 +/- 5.8(p <0.05)和52.3 +/- 7.4%(p <0.05)。结果表明,HEGC和RIST方法补充了组织放射性2-脱氧葡萄糖摄取的测定方法,都是表征HISS机制中胰岛素敏感性变化的合适方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号