...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Impact of in-hospital revascularization on survival in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome and congestive heart failure.
【24h】

Impact of in-hospital revascularization on survival in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome and congestive heart failure.

机译:非ST段抬高的急性冠状动脉综合征和充血性心力衰竭患者的院内血运重建对生存的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome complicated by congestive heart failure (CHF) have a poor prognosis. The aims of this study were to describe the use of revascularization in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome and CHF and to analyze its impact on survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events, 29 844 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome were enrolled at 120 hospitals in 14 countries between April 1999 and June 2007; 4953 had CHF at presentation. One fifth of the patients with CHF underwent revascularization versus 35% of those without CHF (P<0.001). Among CHF patients, revascularized patients had lower-risk baseline clinical characteristics than nonrevascularized patients and were more likely to receive evidence-based cardiac medications. Hospital rates were not affected by revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.33, P=0.87). Death from discharge to 6-month follow-up was lower in patients who underwent revascularization than in those who did not (odds ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.74, P<0.001). This difference persisted after adjustment for GRACE risk score variables, country, and propensity for revascularization (odds ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.85, P=0.005). When revascularization as a time-varying covariate was taken into account in an adjusted Cox regression, the rate of death was again lower in patients undergoing revascularization (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.93, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This observational study suggests a low use of in-hospital revascularization in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients with CHF. The consistent reduction in postdischarge death in revascularized patients suggests that broader application of revascularization in this high-risk group may be beneficial.
机译:背景:非ST段抬高的急性冠状动脉综合征并发充血性心力衰竭(CHF)的患者预后较差。这项研究的目的是描述血运重建术在非ST段抬高的急性冠脉综合征和CHF中的应用,并分析其对生存的影响。方法和结果:1999年4月至2007年6月,在全球14个国家的120家医院的29例急性冠状动脉事件中,共纳入29 844例非ST段抬高的急性冠状动脉综合征患者。 4953年的演示文稿有CHF。五分之一的CHF患者进行了血运重建,而无CHF的患者为35%(P <0.001)。在CHF患者中,血管再通的患者的基线临床特征比未血管再通的患者低,并且更有可能接受循证心脏药物。住院率不受血运重建的影响(调整后的危险比为0.97,95%置信区间为0.72至1.33,P = 0.87)。进行血运重建的患者从出院到随访6个月的死亡率低于未进行血运重建的患者(优势比0.51,95%置信区间0.35至0.74,P <0.001)。调整GRACE风险评分变量,国家/地区和血运重建倾向后,这种差异仍然存在(赔率0.58,95%置信区间0.40至0.85,P = 0.005)。当在调整的Cox回归中将血运重建作为随时间变化的协变量考虑时,进行血运重建的患者的死亡率再次降低(危险比0.64,95%置信区间0.45至0.93,P = 0.02)。结论:这项观察性研究表明,在非ST段抬高的急性冠心病综合征患者中,院内血运重建的使用率较低。血运重建患者出院后死亡率的持续下降表明,在高危人群中更广泛地应用血运重建可能是有益的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号