首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume >Injection of the subacromial bursa in patients with rotator cuff syndrome a prospective, randomized study comparing the effectiveness of different routes: A prospective, randomized study comparing the effectiveness of different routes
【24h】

Injection of the subacromial bursa in patients with rotator cuff syndrome a prospective, randomized study comparing the effectiveness of different routes: A prospective, randomized study comparing the effectiveness of different routes

机译:肩袖囊炎患者肩袖综合征的注射一项前瞻性随机研究,比较不同途径的有效性:一项前瞻性,随机研究,比较不同途径的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Rotator cuff syndrome is often treated with subacromial injection of corticosteroid and local anesthetic. It has not been established if the common injection routes of the bursa are equally accurate. Methods: We conducted a prospective clinical trial involving seventy-five shoulders in seventy-five patients who were randomly assigned to receive a subacromial injection through an anterior, lateral, or posterior route with respect to the acromion. An experienced physician performed the injections, which contained radiopaque contrast medium, corticosteroid, and local anesthetic. After the injection, a musculoskeletal radiologist, blinded to the injection route, interpreted all of the radiographs. Results: The rate of accuracy varied with the route of injection, with a rate of 56% for the posterior route, 84% for the anterior route, and 92% for the lateral route (p = 0.006; chi-square test). The accuracy of injection through the posterior route was significantly lower than that through either the anterior or the lateral route (p < 0.05 for both comparisons; Poisson regression). In addition, the accuracy of injection was significantly lower in females than in males (p < 0.006; chisquare test). Among males, no differences between the routes were noted (with accuracy rates of 89% for the posterior route, 92% for the anterior route, and 93% for the lateral route). Among females, however, the accuracy of injection was lower for the posterior route than for either the anterior or the lateral route (with accuracy rates of 38% for the posterior route, 77% for the anterior route, and 91% for the lateral route) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The anterior and lateral routes of subacromial bursal injection were more accurate than the posterior route. The accuracy of subacromial bursal injection was significantly different between males and females, mainly because of a lower accuracy of bursal injection with use of the posterior route in females. The present study suggests that the posterior route is the least accurate method for injection of the subacromial bursa in females. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
机译:背景:肩袖综合症通常通过肩峰下注射皮质类固醇激素和局部麻醉药治疗。尚未确定法氏囊的常见注射途径是否同样准确。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性临床试验,研究对象是75位患者,其中75位患者被随机分配为通过前,后或后方途径接受肩峰以下的肩峰下注射。一位经验丰富的医生进行了注射,其中包含不透射线的造影剂,皮质类固醇和局部麻醉药。注射后,肌肉骨骼放射科医生对注射路线视而不见,对所有X光片进行了解释。结果:准确率随注射途径的不同而不同,后路的准确率为56%,前路的准确率为84%,侧向的准确率为92%(p = 0.006;卡方检验)。通过后路注射的准确性显着低于通过前路或侧向注射的准确性(两个比较均p <0.05;泊松回归)。此外,女性的注射准确度明显低于男性(p <0.006;卡方检验)。在男性之间,没有发现路线之间的差异(后路的准确率为89%,前路的准确率为92%,侧向的准确率为93%)。然而,在女性中,后路注射的准确性低于前路或侧向注射(后路的准确率分别为38%,前路的77%和侧向的91% )(p <0.05)。结论:肩峰下法囊注射的前路和后路比后路更准确。男性和女性的肩峰法下注药的准确性显着不同,这主要是因为女性使用后路法式注药的准确性较低。目前的研究表明,后路是注射女性肩峰滑囊最不准确的方法。证据级别:治疗级别I。有关证据级别的完整说明,请参见《作者须知》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号