首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume >Early patient outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty with quadriceps-sparing subvastus and medial parapatellar techniques: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial
【24h】

Early patient outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty with quadriceps-sparing subvastus and medial parapatellar techniques: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial

机译:保留四头肌的膝下血管和media骨内侧副手技术进行全膝关节置换术后的早期患者结果:一项随机,双盲临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Techniques that reduce injury to the knee extensor mechanism may cause less pain and allow faster recovery of knee function after primary total knee arthroplasty. A quadriceps-sparing (QS) subvastus technique of total knee arthroplasty was compared with medial parapatellar arthrotomy (MPPA) to determine which surgical technique led to better patient-reported function and less postoperative pain and opioid utilization. Methods: In this prospective, double-blind study, 129 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were randomized to the QS or the MPPA group after skin incision. All surgical procedures utilized minimally invasive surgery principles and standardized anesthesia, implants, analgesia, and rehabilitation. The Knee Society Score (KSS) was obtained at baseline and one and three months after surgery.Weekly telephone interviews were used to collect patient-reported outcomes including ambulatory device use, the UCLA (University of California Los Angeles) activity score, performance of daily living activities, and opioid utilization. Results: No differences between groups were seen in opioid utilization, either during the acute hospitalization or in the eight weeks after surgery. The QS group reported significantly less pain at rest on postoperative day one and with activity on day three (p = 0.04 for each). Compared with baseline, both groups showed significant improvements in the KSS at one month (MPPA, p = 0.0278; QS, p = 0.0021) and three months (p < 0.0001 for each) as well as week-to-week gains in walking independence through five weeks after surgery. Independence from ambulatory devices outside the home lagged behind independence indoors by about two weeks in both groups. Conclusions: When primary total knee arthroplasty was performed with contemporary minimally invasive surgery principles and standardized implants, anesthesia, and postoperative pathways, the QS technique yielded no significant early functional advantages or differences in opioid utilization compared with the MPPA technique. However, the mean pain scores reported by patients in the QS group were slightly lower at rest on postoperative day one and during activity on day three. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
机译:背景:减少对膝伸肌机制的伤害的技术可以减少疼痛,并在初次全膝关节置换术后使膝关节功能更快恢复。将全膝关节置换术的保留四头肌(QS)的亚血管技术与内侧para骨副关节切开术(MPPA)进行比较,以确定哪种手术技术可带来更好的患者报告功能,并减少术后疼痛和阿片类药物的利用。方法:在这项前瞻性,双盲研究中,将129名行全膝关节置换术的患者在皮肤切口后随机分为QS组或MPPA组。所有手术程序均采用微创手术原则,并采用标准化的麻醉,植入物,镇痛和康复措施。膝关节评分(KSS)是在基线以及手术后一个月和三个月获得的。每周电话访谈用于收集患者报告的结局,包括非卧床器械的使用,加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)活动评分,每日表现生活活动和阿片类药物的利用。结果:在急性住院期间或手术后八周内,阿片类药物的使用无差异。 QS组在术后第一天和第三天活动时的休息时疼痛明显减少(每个p = 0.04)。与基线相比,两组在一个月(MPPA,p = 0.0278; QS,p = 0.0021)和三个月(每个p <0.0001)时,KSS均有显着改善,并且每周独立行走的收益增加手术后五周。两组的家庭外移动设备的独立性落后于室内独立性约两个星期。结论:当采用当代微创手术原则和标准化的植入物,麻醉和术后途径进行原发性全膝关节置换术时,与MPPA技术相比,QS技术没有明显的早期功能优势或阿片类药物的使用差异。但是,QS组患者报告的平均疼痛评分在术后第一天休息和第三天活动期间略低。证据级别:治疗级别I。有关证据级别的完整说明,请参见《作者须知》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号