首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume >Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens.
【24h】

Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens.

机译:髋关节表面置换后植入物失败的模式:267个取回标本的形态和磨损分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Resurfacing of the hip joint is experiencing a revival due to improvements in materials, design, and manufacturing techniques. Despite good midterm outcomes, the high early rate of failure and concerns about metal debris require a detailed morphological and wear analysis of retrieved resurfacing implants in order to understand failure mechanisms. METHODS: A worldwide collection of hip resurfacing revision devices was initiated, and 267 components were received. Devices were analyzed by patient demographics, radiographic positioning, and wear, as well as morphologically and histologically. Specimens were grouped into four different failure types. They were also stratified into rim-loaded or non-rim-loaded groups. Failures were also assessed by surgeon learning-curve effects. RESULTS: Time to failure was significantly different between the four revision-type groups: Specimens with fractures involving the implant rim were most common (46%) and failed earliest after surgery (mean of ninety-nine days), followed by fractures inside the femoral head (20%, 262 days) and loose cups (9%, 423 days). Revisions not due to fractures or cup loosening (25%) occurred at a mean of 722 days after surgery. Rim-loaded implants exhibited an average twenty-one to twenty-sevenfold higher wear rate than implants without rim-loading. Rim-loaded implants also showed a steeper mean cup inclination than their non-rim-loaded counterparts (59 degrees compared with 50 degrees ). Most failures occurred during the learning curve of the surgeon (the first fifty to 100 implantations). CONCLUSIONS: Failures on the femoral side usually occur within the first nine months after surgery and appear to be most directly related to the implantation technique or patient selection. Later failures are observed mainly due to acetabular problems, either due to dramatically increased wear or poor cup anchorage. Improper cup anteversion may be similar to or more important than cup inclination in producing excessive wear.
机译:背景:由于材料,设计和制造技术的改进,髋关节的表面置换正在复兴。尽管中期结果良好,但早期的高失败率和对金属碎屑的担忧要求对回收的重铺表面植入物进行详细的形态和磨损分析,以了解其失败机理。方法:开始在全球范围内收集髋关节表面翻修装置,并收到267个组件。通过患者人口统计学,射线照相定位和磨损以及形态和组织学分析设备。标本分为四种不同的失效类型。它们也被分为边缘加载组或非边缘加载组。还通过外科医生的学习曲线效应来评估失败。结果:四个翻修类型组之间的失败时间显着不同:标本中植入物边缘骨折的病例最常见(46%),且最早在手术后失败(平均99天),其次是股骨内部骨折头(20%,262天)和松散的杯子(9%,423天)。并非由于骨折或杯体松动引起的翻修(25%)平均在术后722天进行。轮辋负载的植入物比没有轮辋负载的植入物的磨损率平均高21至27倍。边缘加载的植入物的平均杯倾斜度也比未边缘加载的植入物高(59度比50度)。大多数失败发生在外科医生的学习曲线期间(最初的50到100次植入)。结论:股骨侧失败通常发生在手术后的前九个月内,并且似乎与植入技术或患者选择最直接相关。观察到后来的失败主要是由于髋臼问题,或者是由于磨损急剧增加或杯固定不良所致。不适当的杯体前倾可能会导致杯体过度磨损,与杯体倾斜度相似或更重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号