...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume >Randomized comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty. Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older patients.
【24h】

Randomized comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty. Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older patients.

机译:复位和固定,双极半髋置换和全髋置换的随机比较。健康老年患者移位性囊内髋部骨折的治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgeons vary in their management of displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip in healthy older patients. The aim of this investigation was to determine the functional, clinical, and resource consequences of three different types of surgical treatment. METHODS: The study was a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Reduction and fixation was compared with bipolar hemiarthroplasty with cement and total hip replacement with cement. Participating surgeons elected to randomize their patients to be treated with either one of the three types of procedures or with either fixation or bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Functional outcomes were measured with a hip-rating questionnaire and the EuroQol health status measure. Clinical outcomes included mortality and complications. The direct health service costs were compared. Participants were followed up for two years. RESULTS: Two hundred and seven patients were randomized to be treated with one of the three operations, and ninety-one were randomized to be treated with either fixation or bipolar hemiarthroplasty. There were no differences in the mortality rates among the treatment groups. The rate of secondary surgery was highest in the fixation group (39% compared with 5% in the group treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty and 9% in the group treated with total hip replacement). The fixation group had the worst hip-rating-questionnaire and EuroQol scores at four and twelve months. The total hip replacement group had significantly better functional outcome scores at twenty-four months than the other two groups. Although fixation was initially the least costly procedure, this short-term advantage was eroded by significantly higher costs for subsequent hip-related hospital admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroplasty is more clinically effective and cost-effective than reduction and fixation in healthy older patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the hip. The long-term results of total hip replacement may be better than those of bipolar hemiarthroplasty.
机译:背景:骨科外科医生在健康的老年患者中对髋关节置换性囊内骨折的处理方式有所不同。这项研究的目的是确定三种不同类型的手术治疗的功能,临床和资源后果。方法:该研究是一项多中心随机对照试验。将复位和固定与采用水泥的双极半髋置换术和采用水泥的全髋置换术进行了比较。参加手术的外科医生选择将其患者随机分配为使用三种手术中的一种,或者采用固定或双极半髋置换。使用髋关节评分问卷和EuroQol健康状况测量来测量功能结局。临床结果包括死亡率和并发症。比较了直接医疗服务费用。参加者随访了两年。结果:207例患者被随机分配接受三种手术之一的治疗,而91例患者被随机分配接受固定或双极半髋置换术的治疗。治疗组之间的死亡率没有差异。固定组的二次手术发生率最高(39%,而双极半髋置换术组为5%,全髋置换组为9%)。固定组在四个月和十二个月时髋关节评级问卷和EuroQol得分最差。全髋关节置换组在24个月时的功能结局评分明显优于其他两组。尽管起初固定手术是成本最低的手术,但这种短期优势却因随后因髋关节相关的住院治疗而显着增加的费用而受到侵蚀。结论:对于健康的老年髋部移位的囊内骨折患者,关节置换术比复位和固定术更具临床效果和成本效益。全髋关节置换术的长期效果可能优于双极半髋置换术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号