...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British VolumecBritish Orthopaedic Association , Australian Orthopaedic Association , Canadian Orthopaedic Association . . . [et al] >A randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar hemiarthroplasty with total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients
【24h】

A randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar hemiarthroplasty with total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients

机译:比较老年患者股骨颈移位性囊内骨折双极半髋置换与全髋置换的随机对照试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The best treatment for the active and lucid elderly patient with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck is still controversial. Randomised controlled trials have shown that a primary total hip replacement is superior to internal fixation as regards the need for secondary surgery, hip function and health-related quality of life. Despite good results achieved with total hip replacement in this group, most orthopaedic surgeons still advocate hemiarthroplasty for this injury. We studied 120 patients with a mean age of 81 years (70 to 90) with an acute displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. They were randomly allocated to be treated with either a bipolar hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement. Outcome measurements included peri-operative data, general and hip-specific complications, hip function and health-related quality of life. The patients were reviewed at four and 12 months.The duration of surgery was longer in the total hip replacement group (102 minutes (70 to 151)) versus 78 minutes (43 to 131) (p < 0.001), and the intra-operative blood loss was increased 460 ml (100 to 1100) versus 320 ml (50 to 850) (p < 0.001), but there were no differences between the groups regarding any complications or mortality. There were no dislocations in either group. Hip function measured by the Harris hip score was significantly better in the total hip replacement group at both follow-up periods (p = 0.011 and p < 0.001, respectively). The health-related quality of life measure was in favour of the total hip replacement group but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.818 at four months and p = 0.636 at 12 months).These results indicate that a total hip replacement provides better function than a bipolar hemiarthroplasty as soon as one year post-operatively, without increasing the complication rate. We recommend total hip replacement as the primary treatment for this group of patients.
机译:对于活跃而清醒的股骨颈囊内移位的老年患者,最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。随机对照试验表明,就二级手术,髋关节功能和健康相关的生活质量而言,一次全髋关节置换术优于内固定术。尽管该组全髋关节置换术取得了良好的效果,但大多数骨科外科医生仍然主张对这种损伤进行半髋关节置换术。我们研究了120例平均年龄为81岁(70至90岁)的股骨颈急性移位的囊内骨折患者。他们被随机分配接受双极半髋关节置换术或全髋关节置换术治疗。结果测量包括围手术期数据,一般和特定于髋关节的并发症,髋关节功能和健康相关的生活质量。在第4和第12个月对患者进行了检查。全髋关节置换组的手术时间更长(102分钟(70至151))比78分钟(43至131)(p <0.001)更长。失血量从320毫升(50到850)增加了460毫升(100到1100)(p <0.001),但两组之间在并发症或死亡率方面没有差异。两组均无错位。在两次随访期间,在整个髋关节置换组中,用Harris髋关节评分测量的髋关节功能明显更好(分别为p = 0.011和p <0.001)。与健康相关的生活质量衡量指标有利于全髋关节置换组,但未达到统计学意义(四个月时p = 0.818,而在12个月时p = 0.636)这些结果表明,全髋关节置换提供了更好的功能术后一年内较之双极半髋置换术,没有增加并发症的发生率。我们建议全髋关节置换术作为该组患者的主要治疗方法。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号