首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume >Effective treatment of posttraumatic and postoperative edema in patients with ankle and hindfoot fractures: A randomized controlled trial comparing multilayer compression therapy and intermittent impulse compression with the standard treatment with ice
【24h】

Effective treatment of posttraumatic and postoperative edema in patients with ankle and hindfoot fractures: A randomized controlled trial comparing multilayer compression therapy and intermittent impulse compression with the standard treatment with ice

机译:有效治疗脚踝和后足骨折的创伤后和术后水肿:一项随机对照试验,比较多层加压疗法和间歇冲动加压与标准冰疗法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: After ankle and hindfoot fractures, edema has a major impact on the time for surgical intervention and may increase the risk of wound complications and infection postoperatively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of multilayer compression and intermittent impulse compression therapy in reducing ankle and hindfoot edema compared with the standard treatment with elevation and ice. Methods: This was a randomized, controlled, single-blinded clinical trial using a repeated-measures design. Fifty-eight patients with unilateral fractures of the ankle or hindfoot were randomized into the cold pack (control) group, the bandage group, or the impulse compression group and were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The primary outcome was the reduction of edema as measured with the figure-of-eight-20 method. Results: Preoperatively and postoperatively, there were significant differences in edema reduction between the bandage group and the control group. After two days of intervention, the median preoperative edema reduction in the control group was -2.0 mm (-5%) compared with -11.0 mm (-23%) in the bandage group (p < 0.017), and -0.3 mm (0%) in the impulse compression group (p > 0.017). Postoperatively, after two days, the median edema changes were +3.5 mm (+7%) in the control group compared with -7.3 mm (-22%) in the bandage group (p < 0.017) and +5.0 mm (+46%) in the impulse compression group (p > 0.017). Conclusions: Multilayer compression therapy results in a faster reduction of ankle and hindfoot edema, although with less ankle dorsiflexion on postoperative day three than the control group, and can be recommended as an alternative treatment. Intermittent impulse compression applied without any extra compression by stockinette or bandage and without elevation in off-session periods cannot be recommended as a superior alternative to the treatment with ice. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
机译:背景:踝关节和后足骨折后,水肿对手术时间有重大影响,并且可能增加术后伤口并发症和感染的风险。这项研究的目的是评估多层加压和间歇性脉冲加压疗法与常规加高和冰疗法相比,在减少脚踝和后足水肿方面的疗效。方法:这是一项使用重复测量设计的随机,对照,单盲临床试验。 58例踝或后足单侧骨折患者被随机分为冷敷组(对照组),绷带组或冲动压迫组,并根据意向治疗原则进行分析。主要结果是用八位数字图法测量的水肿减少。结果:绷带组与对照组相比,术前,术后水肿减轻有明显差异。干预两天后,对照组的中位术前水肿减轻为-2.0 mm(-5%),而绷带组为-11.0 mm(-23%)(p <0.017),-0.3 mm(0脉冲压缩组(p> 0.017)。术后两天,对照组的中位水肿变化为+3.5 mm(+ 7%),而绷带组的中位水肿变化为-7.3 mm(-22%)(p <0.017)和+5.0 mm(+ 46%) )在脉冲压缩组中(p> 0.017)。结论:多层加压疗法可更快地减轻踝关节和后足水肿,尽管术后第三天的踝背屈比对照组要少,因此可以推荐作为替代疗法。不建议使用间歇冲动加压,而不用弹力带或绷带施加任何额外的加压,并且在休会期间不升高,不建议将其作为冰疗的替代方案。证据级别:治疗级别I。有关证据级别的完整说明,请参见《作者须知》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号