首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Mechanisms underlying the lack of effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy on mortality in high-risk patients with recent myocardial infarction: insights from the Defibrillation in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (DINAMIT).
【24h】

Mechanisms underlying the lack of effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy on mortality in high-risk patients with recent myocardial infarction: insights from the Defibrillation in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (DINAMIT).

机译:缺乏可植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗对近期有心肌梗死的高危患者的死亡率没有影响的潜在机制:急性心肌梗死除颤试验(DINAMIT)的见解。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: although implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) lower mortality in stable patients with low ejection fraction late after myocardial infarction, randomized trials of ICD versus control subjects implanted early after myocardial infarction do not show mortality benefit. Our objective was to investigate possible mechanisms underlying the lack of mortality benefit in the Defibrillation in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (DINAMIT). METHODS AND RESULTS: this is a secondary analysis of the prospective randomized clinical trial. Outpatients with recent (6 to 40 days) acute myocardial infarction, left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <35%), and low heart rate variability were randomized to ICD (n=311) or to standard medical therapy (n=342). In a competing-risks analysis, those factors that increased the risk of arrhythmic death also increased the risk of nonarrhythmic deaths. After adjustment for these factors, receiving an ICD was associated with a decreased risk of arrhythmic death (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 0.71) but an increase in nonarrhythmic death (hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 2.80). In an adjusted time-dependent analysis, patients receiving an ICD and having appropriate ICD therapy had a 15.1% yearly hazard of mortality compared with 5.2% in ICD patients with no appropriate therapy (P<0.001). The reduction in sudden death in ICD patients was completely offset by increased nonarrhythmic deaths, which were greatest in patients receiving ICD shock therapy (hazard ratio, 6.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.8 to 12.7). CONCLUSIONS: in patients receiving ICDs early after myocardial infarction, those factors that are associated with arrhythmia requiring ICD therapy are also associated with a high risk of nonsudden death, negating the benefit of ICDs in this setting.
机译:背景:尽管植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)可以降低心肌梗塞后晚期低射血分数的稳定患者的死亡率,但ICD与心肌梗塞后早期植入的对照受试者的随机试验并未显示出死亡率优势。我们的目标是研究在急性心肌梗死试验(DINAMIT)中进行除颤的缺乏死亡率益处的潜在机制。方法与结果:这是前瞻性随机临床试验的次要分析。将近期(6至40天)急性心肌梗死,左心功能不全(射血分数<35%)和低心率变异性的门诊患者随机分配至ICD(n = 311)或标准药物治疗(n = 342)。在竞争风险分析中,那些增加心律失常死亡风险的因素也增加了非心律失常死亡的风险。在对这些因素进行调整之后,接受ICD可使心律失常死亡的风险降低(危险比0.33; 95%置信区间0.15至0.71),但非心律失常死亡的增加(危险比1.70; 95%置信区间1.00至2.80)。在调整后的时间依赖性分析中,接受ICD并接受适当ICD治疗的患者每年有15.1%的死亡危险,而没有适当治疗的ICD患者为5.2%(P <0.001)。非心律失常死亡的增加完全抵消了ICD患者突然死亡的减少,这在接受ICD休克治疗的患者中最大(危险比,6.0; 95%置信区间,2.8至12.7)。结论:在心肌梗塞后早期接受ICD的患者中,那些与需要ICD治疗的心律不齐相关的因素也与非猝死的高风险相关,从而不利于ICD在这种情况下的获益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号