首页> 外文期刊>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics >Two different timings of intrauterine insemination for non-male infertility.
【24h】

Two different timings of intrauterine insemination for non-male infertility.

机译:宫腔内人工授精的两种不同时机用于非男性不育症。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to assess the simplicity and convenience of treatment scheduled not on weekends, by comparing two different timings of intrauterine insemination (IUI) protocol. METHODS: A prospective observational study of two different protocols of intrauterine insemination was designed. Two hundred and ten infertile couples with normal spermiograms were included in this study. Fifty-eight couples were treated with IUI 26 to 28 h after human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection plus timed intercourse within a 12- to 18-hr period and 147 couples had IUI 36 to 38 hr after hCG injection and timed intercourse within a 12- to 18-hour period. Pregnancy rates were compared with two different protocols of IUI. RESULTS: The mean age, duration, and causes of infertility and the cycle characteristics following follicular stimulation were similar between the two groups. The cycle characteristics of follicular stimulation in the two treatment groups were not different. There also were no significant differences between the groups in the type of sperm concentration, sperm motility, and the percentage of sperm with normal morphology per insemination. The number of follicles greater than 17 mm per patient was not significantly different between the two groups. The pregnancy rate per cycle also was similar between the two groups in men with lower motile sperm numbers (< 40 x 10(6)) (23.6% vs. 23.4%) and in men with higher sperm numbers (> or = 40 x 10(6)) (25% vs. 24.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The different timing but similar efficacy of these two IUI protocols provides a practical choice to clinicians. The availability of both protocols may avoid unnecessary scheduling of clinical and laboratory work on weekends and holidays in women participating in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI programs for treatment of non-male infertility.
机译:目的:我们的目的是通过比较两种不同的宫腔内人工授精(IUI)时机来评估计划在周末以外进行的治疗的简便性。方法:对两种不同的宫腔内人工授精方案进行前瞻性观察研究。这项研究包括了210例精子检查正常的不孕夫妇。注射绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)26至28小时后,对58对夫妇进行IUI治疗,并在12至18小时内定时间隔性交;注射hCG后36至38小时,对147对夫妻进行IUI治疗,并在12小时内定时性交-长达18小时。将妊娠率与两种不同的IUI方案进行了比较。结果:两组的平均年龄,病程和不育原因以及卵泡刺激后的周期特征相似。两个治疗组的卵泡刺激周期特征没有差异。两组之间在精子浓度,精子运动性和每次受精形态正常的精子百分比上也没有显着差异。两组之间的每个患者大于17毫米的卵泡数量没有显着差异。运动精子数量较低(<40 x 10(6))(23.6%vs. 23.4%)的男性和精子数量较高(> or = 40 x 10的男性)的每周期妊娠率也相似(6))(25%比24.4%)。结论:这两种IUI协议的时机不同但功效相似,为临床医生提供了一个实用的选择。两种方案的可用性都可以避免参加控制性卵巢过度刺激和IUI治疗非男性不育症的妇女在周末和节假日不必要地安排临床和实验室工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号