首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Asian Economics >Whither Development Economics? Suggestions for a new type of Development Economics in the light of China's experience
【24h】

Whither Development Economics? Suggestions for a new type of Development Economics in the light of China's experience

机译:还需要发展经济学吗?根据中国的经验对新型发展经济学的建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

More than 50 years have elapsed since the publication of my doctoral dissertation in Harvard University Press in 1949: Agriculture and Industrialization. I returned from the United States to my motherland in early 1946 after finishing my graduate studies at Harvard. Although severed from my Western counterparts since then, I never lost my interest in the trend of world economic development at large. As most of us are aware, immediately after the World War II there was a crop of economic literature dealing with development of the developing countries which had just shattered their colonial yoke and were striving for economic independence and prosperity. Many theoretical models were offered by economists from international organizations and donor nations, such as the Linear-Stages Theory, Structural Change Models, the International-Dependence Revolution, and the Neoclassical Counter-Revolution, and policy recommendations based on these models were actually adopted and put into practice during the 1950 and 1960s. But unfortunately on the whole their efforts proved disappointing; for apart from a few successful examples of NICS such as the four Asian Tigers, the vast majority of developing countries remained poor. Thus towards the end of 1970 and 1980s the development profession seemed exhausted of its original vehemence. As some economists said, it is on the "decline and fall," or it has entered into a stage of "diminishing returns,' and even "heading towards a total demise."
机译:自从我的博士学位论文于1949年在哈佛大学出版社出版以来,已有50多年的历史了:农业与工业化。在哈佛完成研究生学习后,我于1946年初从美国回到祖国。尽管从那时起我就与西方同行割裂了,但我从未对世界经济发展的总体趋势失去兴趣。正如我们大多数人所知道的那样,第二次世界大战后不久,出现了一系列有关发展中国家发展的经济文献,这些文献刚刚粉碎了它们的殖民统治,并为经济独立和繁荣而努力。国际组织和捐助国的经济学家提供了许多理论模型,例如线性阶段理论,结构变化模型,国际依存革命和新古典反革命,并且实际上采纳了基于这些模型的政策建议,并且在1950和1960年代投入实践。但是不幸的是,总的来说,他们的努力令人失望。除了一些成功的NICS范例(例如四个亚洲虎)外,绝大多数发展中国家仍然贫穷。因此,在1970年代和1980年代末,发展专业似乎耗尽了其最初的活力。正如一些经济学家所说,它正在“下降和下降”,或者已经进入“收益递减”甚至“走向彻底灭亡”的阶段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号