首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Polymer-Free Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting Versus New Generation Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease: The Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) Trial.
【24h】

Polymer-Free Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting Versus New Generation Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease: The Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) Trial.

机译:无聚合物西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱与新一代佐他莫司洗脱支架在冠状动脉疾病中的应用:冠状动脉内支架和血管造影结果:西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱与佐他莫司洗脱支架(ISAR-TEST 5)的试验功效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background- Durable polymer coatings have been implicated in mid- and long-term adverse events after drug-eluting stent implantation. A polymer-free dual-drug sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and a new generation permanent polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent are recently developed technologies demonstrating encouraging results. Methods and Results- In a clinical trial with minimal exclusion criteria, we randomly assigned 3002 patients to treatment with sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus zotarolimus-eluting stents. The trial was designed to demonstrate noninferiority of the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents. The primary end point was the combined incidence of cardiac death, target-vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target-lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up. Follow-up angiography was scheduled at 6 to 8 months. The sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent was noninferior to the zotarolimus-eluting stent in terms of occurrence of the primary end point (13.1% versus 13.5%, respectively, P(noninferiority)=0.006; hazard ratio=0.97, 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.19; P(superiority)=0.74). The incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis was low in both groups (1.1% versus 1.2%, respectively; hazard ratio=0.91 [95% confidence interval, 0.45 to 1.84], P=0.80). With regard to angiographic efficacy, there were no differences between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the zotarolimus-eluting stent in terms of either in-segment binary angiographic restenosis (13.3% versus 13.4% respectively; P=0.95) or in-stent late luminal loss (0.31+/-0.58 mm versus 0.29+/-0.56 mm, respectively; P=0.46). Conclusion- In this large-scale study powered for clinical end points, a polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent was noninferior to a new generation durable polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stent out to 12 months. Clinical Trial Registration- http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier NCT 00598533.
机译:背景-耐用的聚合物涂层已涉及药物洗脱支架植入后的中长期不良事件。最近开发出了无聚合物西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱双药支架和新一代永久聚合物佐他莫司洗脱支架,这些技术证明了令人鼓舞的结果。方法和结果-在一项具有最低排除标准的临床试验中,我们随机分配3002例患者接受西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架与佐他莫司洗脱支架的治疗。该试验旨在证明西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架的非劣效性。主要终点是1年随访中的心源性死亡,靶血管相关性心肌梗塞或靶病变血运重建的总发生率。随访血管造影定于6至8个月。就主要终点的发生而言,西罗莫司洗脱支架和普罗布考洗脱支架均不逊于佐他莫司洗脱支架(分别为13.1%和13.5%,P(非劣效性)= 0.006;危险比= 0.97,95%置信区间,0.78至1.19; P(优势)= 0.74)。两组明确/可能的支架内血栓形成的发生率均较低(分别为1.1%和1.2%;危险比= 0.91 [95%置信区间,0.45至1.84],P = 0.80)。就血管造影效果而言,西罗莫司洗脱支架和普罗布考洗脱支架与佐他莫司洗脱支架在段内二值血管造影再狭窄方面分别无分别(分别为13.3%和13.4%; P = 0.95)或-支架晚期管腔丢失(分别为0.31 +/- 0.58 mm和0.29 +/- 0.56 mm; P = 0.46)。结论-在这项针对临床终点的大规模研究中,在12个月内,无聚合物的西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架均不逊于新一代耐用的基于聚合物的佐他莫司洗脱支架。临床试验注册-http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符NCT 00598533。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号