...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >When more is not better: treatment intensification among hypertensive patients with poor medication adherence.
【24h】

When more is not better: treatment intensification among hypertensive patients with poor medication adherence.

机译:如果还没有更好,那就是对药物依从性差的高血压患者进行强化治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Hypertension may be poorly controlled because patients do not take their medications (poor adherence) or because providers do not increase medication when appropriate (lack of medication intensification, or "clinical inertia"). We examined the prevalence of and relationship between patient adherence and provider treatment intensification. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used a retrospective cohort study of hypertensive patients who had filled prescriptions for 1 or more blood pressure (BP) medications at Veterans' Affairs (VA) healthcare facilities in a Midwestern VA administrative region. Our sample included all patients who received at least 2 outpatient BP medication refills during 2004 and had 1 or more outpatient primary care visits with an elevated systolic BP >140 but <200 mm Hg or diastolic BP >90 mm Hg during 2005 (n=38,327). For each episode of elevated BP during 2005 (68,610 events), we used electronic pharmacy refill data to examine patients' BP medication adherence over the prior 12 months and whether providers increased doses or added BP medications ("intensification"). Multivariate analyses accounted for the clustering of elevated BP events within patients and adjusted for patient age, comorbidities, number of BP medications, encounter systolic BP, and average systolic BP over the prior year. Providers intensified medications in 30% of the 68,610 elevated BP events, with almost no variation in intensification regardless of whether patients had good or poor BP medication adherence. After adjustment, intensification rates were 31% among patients who had "gaps" of <20% (days on which patients should have had medication but no medication was available because medications had not been refilled), 34% among patients with refill gaps of 20% to 59%, and 32% among patients with gaps of 60% or more. CONCLUSIONS: Intensification of medications occurred in fewer than one third of visits in which patients had an elevated BP. Patients' prior medication adherence had little impact on providers' decisions about intensifying medications, even at very high levels of poor adherence. Addressing both patient adherence and provider intensification simultaneously would most likely result in better BP control.
机译:背景:由于患者不服用药物(依从性差)或由于提供者在适当的时候不增加药物治疗(缺乏药物强化或“临床惯性”),高血压的控制可能不佳。我们检查了患者依从性和提供者治疗强度的患病率及其之间的关系。方法和结果:我们使用一项回顾性队列研究,对在中西部弗吉尼亚州行政区域的退伍军人事务(VA)医疗机构中已开具1种或多种血压(BP)药物处方的高血压患者进行了回顾性研究。我们的样本包括所有在2004年期间接受至少2次门诊BP药物补充治疗且在2005年期间进行了1次或多次门诊初级护理就诊的患者,这些患者的收缩压> 140 mmHg或舒张压> 90 mm Hg升高(n = 38,327) )。对于2005年期间每次血压升高事件(68,610次事件),我们使用电子药房充值数据检查了患者在过去12个月中对BP药物的依从性,以及提供者是否增加剂量或添加了BP药物(“强化”)。多变量分析说明了患者中血压升高的聚类,并根据患者的年龄,合并症,血压药物的数量,发生收缩压以及上一年的平均收缩压进行了调整。在68,610例BP升高事件中,有30%的提供者使用了强化药物,无论患者对BP药物的依从性好坏,强化程度几乎没有变化。调整后,“缺口”小于20%(应服药但因未重新填充而无法使用药物的天数)的患者中,强化率是31%,在填充间隙为20的患者中,强化率为34% %到59%,差距在60%或更大的患者中占32%。结论:在患者血压升高的访视中,少于三分之一的患者出现药物强化。患者先前对药物的依从性即使在非常高的依从性差的情况下,对提供者加强药物治疗的决定几乎没有影响。同时解决患者的依从性和提供者强化问题,很可能会导致更好的血压控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号