...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Glycemic control and cardiovascular events in diabetic hemodialysis patients.
【24h】

Glycemic control and cardiovascular events in diabetic hemodialysis patients.

机译:糖尿病血液透析患者的血糖控制和心血管事件。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Patients on maintenance dialysis treatment experience an excess mortality, predominantly of sudden cardiac death. Poor glycemic control is associated with cardiovascular comorbidities in the general population. This study investigated the impact of glycemic control on cardiac and vascular outcomes in diabetic hemodialysis patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Glycohemoglobin A1c (HbA(1c)) was measured in 1255 hemodialysis patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who participated in the German Diabetes and Dialysis Study (4D Study) and were followed up for a median of 4 years. Using Cox regression analyses, we determined hazard ratios to reach prespecified, adjudicated end points according to HbA(1c) levels at baseline: sudden cardiac death (n=160), myocardial infarction (n=200), stroke (n=103), cardiovascular events (n=469), death caused by heart failure (n=41), and all-cause mortality (n=617). Patients had a mean age of 66+/-8 years (54% male) and mean HbA(1c) of 6.7+/-1.3%. Patients with an HbA(1c) >8% had a >2-fold higher risk of sudden death compared with those with an HbA(1c) < or =6% (hazard ratio, 2.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.33 to 3.44), persisting in multivariate models. With each 1% increase in HbA(1c), the risk of sudden death rose significantly by 18%; similarly, cardiovascular events and mortality increased by 8%. There was a trend for higher risks of stroke and deaths resulting from heart failure, whereas myocardial infarction was not affected. The increased risks of both cardiovascular events and mortality were explained mainly by the impact of HbA(1c) on sudden death. CONCLUSIONS: Poor glycemic control was strongly associated with sudden cardiac death in diabetic hemodialysis patients, which accounted for increased cardiovascular events and mortality. In contrast, myocardial infarction was not affected. Whether interventions achieving tight glycemic control decrease sudden death requires further evaluation. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicalstudyresults.org. Unique identifier: CT-981-423-239.
机译:背景:接受透析治疗的患者死亡率过高,主要是猝死。一般人群的血糖控制不良与心血管合并症有关。这项研究调查了血糖控制对糖尿病血液透析患者心脏和血管结局的影响。方法和结果:在参加德国糖尿病和透析研究(4D研究)的1255名2型糖尿病血液透析患者中​​,对糖化血红蛋白A1c(HbA(1c))进行了测量,平均随访4年。使用Cox回归分析,我们根据基线的HbA(1c)水平确定了达到预先设定的判定终点的危险比:心脏猝死(n = 160),心肌梗塞(n = 200),中风(n = 103),心血管事件(n = 469),因心力衰竭导致的死亡(n = 41)和全因死亡率(n = 617)。患者平均年龄为66 +/- 8岁(男性54%),平均HbA(1c)为6.7 +/- 1.3%。 HbA(1c)> 8%的患者的猝死风险是HbA(1c)<或= 6%的患者的2倍以上(危险比,2.14; 95%置信区间,1.33至3.44) ,坚持使用多变量模型。随着HbA(1c)的每增加1%,突然死亡的风险显着增加18%;同样,心血管事件和死亡率增加了8%。有因心力衰竭而导致中风和死亡的风险较高的趋势,而心肌梗塞不受影响。 HbA(1c)对猝死的影响主要解释了心血管事件和死亡率增加的风险。结论:糖尿病血液透析患者血糖控制不佳与心脏猝死密切相关,这导致心血管事件和死亡率增加。相反,心肌梗塞不受影响。实现严格的血糖控制的干预措施是否可以减少猝死,需要进一步评估。临床试验注册-URL:http://www.clinicalstudyresults.org。唯一标识符:CT-981-423-239。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号