...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied physiology >Effects of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training on endothelial function and cardiometabolic risk markers in obese adults
【24h】

Effects of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training on endothelial function and cardiometabolic risk markers in obese adults

机译:高强度间歇训练和中强度连续训练对肥胖成年人内皮功能和心脏代谢危险指标的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We hypothesized that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) would be more effective than moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) at improving endothelial function and maximum oxygen uptake ((V) over dot(O2 max)) in obese adults. Eighteen participants [35.1 +/- 8.1 (SD) yr; body mass index = 36.0 +/- 5.0 kg/m(2)] were randomized to 8 wk (3 sessions/wk) of either HIIT [10 x 1 min, 90-95% maximum heart rate (HRmax), 1-min active recovery] or MICT (30 min, 70-75% HRmax). Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) increased after HIIT (5.13 +/- 2.80% vs. 8.98 +/- 2.86%, P = 0.02) but not after MICT (5.23 +/- 2.82% vs. 3.05 +/- 2.76%, P = 0.16). Resting artery diameter increased after MICT (3.68 +/- 0.58 mm vs. 3.86 +/- 0.58 mm, P = 0.02) but not after HIIT (4.04 +/- 0.70 mm vs. 4.09 +/- 0.70 mm; P = 0.63). There was a significant (P = 0.02) group x time interaction in low flow-mediated constriction (L-FMC) between MICT (0.63 +/- 2.00% vs. - 2.79 +/- 3.20%; P = 0.03) and HIIT (-1.04 +/- 4.09% vs. 1.74 +/- 3.46%; P = 0.29). (V) over dot(O2 max) increased (P < 0.01) similarly after HIIT (2.19 +/- 0.65 l/min vs. 2.64 +/- 0.88 l/min) and MICT (2.24 +/- 0.48 l/min vs. 2.55 +/- 0.61 l/min). Biomarkers of cardiovascular risk and endothelial function were unchanged. HIIT and MICT produced different vascular adaptations in obese adults, with HIIT improving FMD and MICT increasing resting artery diameter and enhancing L-FMC. HIIT required 27.5% less total exercise time and similar to 25% less energy expenditure than MICT.
机译:我们假设,在肥胖成年人中,高强度间歇训练(HIIT)在改善内皮功能和最大摄氧量((V)超过dot(O2 max))方面比中等强度连续训练(MICT)更有效。 18名参与者[35.1 +/- 8.1(SD)年;体重指数= 36.0 +/- 5.0 kg / m(2)]随机分为8周(3次/周)HIIT [10 x 1分钟,最大心率(HRmax)90-95%,1分钟]主动恢复]或MICT(30分钟,最高心率70-75%)。 HIIT后肱动脉血流介导的扩张(FMD)增加(5.13 +/- 2.80%vs. 8.98 +/- 2.86%,P = 0.02),但在MICT之后没有增加(5.23 +/- 2.82%vs. 3.05 +/- 2.76 %,P = 0.16)。 MICT后静息动脉直径增加(3.68 +/- 0.58 mm对3.86 +/- 0.58 mm,P = 0.02),但HIIT后未增加(4.04 +/- 0.70 mm对4.09 +/- 0.70 mm; P = 0.63) 。 MICT(0.63 +/- 2.00%vs--2.79 +/- 3.20%; P = 0.03)和HIIT(L = FM)之间存在显着(P = 0.02)组x时间交互作用-1.04 +/- 4.09%与1.74 +/- 3.46%; P = 0.29)。 HIIT(2.19 +/- 0.65 l / min vs. 2.64 +/- 0.88 l / min)和MICT(2.24 +/- 0.48 l / min vs.)之后,点上的(V)(O2 max)增加(P <0.01) 2.55 +/- 0.61 l / min)。心血管风险和内皮功能的生物标志物未改变。 HIIT和MICT在肥胖成年人中产生了不同的血管适应性变化,其中HIIT改善了FMD,而MICT则增加了静息动脉直径并增强了L-FMC。与MICT相比,HIIT所需的总运动时间减少了27.5%,能耗减少了25%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号