首页> 外文期刊>Journal of anxiety disorders >Selective visual working memory in fear of spiders: the role of automaticity and material-specificity.
【24h】

Selective visual working memory in fear of spiders: the role of automaticity and material-specificity.

机译:害怕蜘蛛的选择性视觉工作记忆:自动性和材料特异性的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Following cognitive models of anxiety, biases occur if threat processing is automatic versus strategic. Therefore, most of these models predict attentional bias, but not explicit memory bias. We suggest dividing memory into the highly automatic working memory (WM) component versus long-term memory when investigating bias in anxiety. WM for threat has rarely been investigated although its main function is stimulus monitoring, particularly important in anxiety. We investigated WM for spiders in spider fearfuls (SFs) versus non-anxious controls (NACs). In Experiment 1 (23 SFs/24 NACs), we replicated an earlier WM study, reducing strategic processing options. This led to stronger group differences and, thus, clearer WM threat biases. There were no group differences in Experiment 2 (18 SFs/19 NACs), using snakes instead of spiders to test whether WM biases are material-specific. This article supports cognitive models of anxiety in that biases are more likely to occur when reducing strategic processing. However, it contradicts the assumption that explicit memory biases are not characteristic of anxiety.
机译:按照焦虑的认知模型,如果威胁处理是自动还是策略处理,就会产生偏见。因此,这些模型中的大多数预测了注意力偏差,但没有显式的记忆偏差。当调查焦虑的偏见时,我们建议将记忆分为高度自动的工作记忆(WM)组件和长期记忆。尽管WM的主要功能是刺激监测,但在焦虑症中尤为重要,因此几乎没有研究过用于威胁的WM。我们调查了蜘蛛恐惧症(SF)与非焦虑对照(NAC)中蜘蛛的WM。在实验1(23个SF / 24个NAC)中,我们重复了较早的WM研究,减少了战略处理选项。这导致了更强的群体差异,因此,更清晰的WM威胁偏见。在实验2(18个SF / 19个NAC)中,使用蛇形代替蜘蛛来测试WM偏倚是否是特定于材料的,两组之间没有差异。本文支持焦虑的认知模型,因为减少战略流程时更容易出现偏见。但是,它与外显的记忆偏差不是焦虑的特征这一假设相矛盾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号