首页> 外文期刊>Journal of anxiety disorders >Relative effects of cognitive and behavioral therapies on generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder and panic disorder: A meta-analysis
【24h】

Relative effects of cognitive and behavioral therapies on generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder and panic disorder: A meta-analysis

机译:认知和行为疗法对广泛性焦虑症,社交焦虑症和恐慌症的相对影响:一项荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although cognitive and behavioral therapies are effective in the treatment of anxiety disorders, it is not clear what the relative effects of these treatments are. We conducted a meta-analysis of trials comparing cognitive and behavioral therapies with a control condition, in patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and panic disorder. We included 42 studies in which generic measures of anxiety were used (BAI, HAMA, STAI-State and Trait). Only the effects of treatment for panic disorder as measured on the BAI (13.33 points; 95% Cl: 10.58-16.07) were significantly (p = 0.001) larger than the effect sizes on GAD (6.06 points; 95% CI: 3.96-8.16) and SAD (5.92 points; 95% CI: 4.64-7.20). The effects remained significant after adjusting for baseline severity and other major characteristics of the trials. The results should be considered with caution because of the small number of studies in many subgroups and the high risk of bias in most studies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:尽管认知和行为疗法对焦虑症的治疗有效,但尚不清楚这些疗法的相对作用是什么。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,比较了患有社交焦虑症(SAD),广泛性焦虑症(GAD)和恐慌症的认知和行为疗法与控制条件的比较。我们纳入了42项使用一般性焦虑测量方法(BAI,HAMA,STAI-State和Trait)的研究。仅在BAI上评估的恐慌症治疗效果(13.33分; 95%Cl:10.58-16.07)显着(p = 0.001)大于对GAD的效果大小(6.06分; 95%CI:3.96-8.16) )和SAD(5.92分; 95%CI:4.64-7.20)。调整基线严重性和其他主要特征后,效果仍然显着。由于许多亚组的研究数量很少,并且大多数研究中存在偏见的风险很高,因此应谨慎考虑结果。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号