首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Supervised exercise versus primary stenting for claudication resulting from aortoiliac peripheral artery disease: Six-month outcomes from the claudication: Exercise versus endoluminal revascularization (CLEVER) study
【24h】

Supervised exercise versus primary stenting for claudication resulting from aortoiliac peripheral artery disease: Six-month outcomes from the claudication: Exercise versus endoluminal revascularization (CLEVER) study

机译:有监督的运动与主动脉支架置入术治疗from动脉周围动脉疾病导致的lau行:the行的六个月结果:运动与腔内血运重建术(CLEVER)研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background-: Claudication is a common and disabling symptom of peripheral artery disease that can be treated with medication, supervised exercise (SE), or stent revascularization (ST). Methods and Results-: We randomly assigned 111 patients with aortoiliac peripheral artery disease to receive 1 of 3 treatments: optimal medical care (OMC), OMC plus SE, or OMC plus ST. The primary end point was the change in peak walking time on a graded treadmill test at 6 months compared with baseline. Secondary end points included free-living step activity, quality of life with the Walking Impairment Questionnaire, Peripheral Artery Questionnaire, Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form, and cardiovascular risk factors. At the 6-month follow-up, change in peak walking time (the primary end point) was greatest for SE, intermediate for ST, and least with OMC (mean change versus baseline, 5.8±4.6, 3.7±4.9, and 1.2±2.6 minutes, respectively; P<0.001 for the comparison of SE versus OMC, P=0.02 for ST versus OMC, and P=0.04 for SE versus ST). Although disease-specific quality of life as assessed by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire and Peripheral Artery Questionnaire also improved with both SE and ST compared with OMC, for most scales, the extent of improvement was greater with ST than SE. Free-living step activity increased more with ST than with either SE or OMC alone (114±274 versus 73±139 versus -6±109 steps per hour), but these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions-: SE results in superior treadmill walking performance than ST, even for those with aortoiliac peripheral artery disease. The contrast between better walking performance for SE and better patient-reported quality of life for ST warrants further study. Clinical Trial Registration-: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/ show/NCT00132743?order=1. Unique identifier: NCT00132743.
机译:背景:lau行dication行是外周动脉疾病的常见和致残症状,可以通过药物治疗,有监督的锻炼(SE)或支架血运重建(ST)进行治疗。方法和结果-:我们随机分配111名主动脉周围动脉疾病患者接受以下3种治疗方法之一:最佳医疗护理(OMC),OMC加SE或OMC加ST。主要终点是分级跑步机测试在6个月时峰值行走时间与基线相比的变化。次要终点包括自由活动的步伐,步行障碍问卷的生活质量,外周动脉问卷,医疗成果研究(十二项简表)和心血管危险因素。在6个月的随访中,SE的峰值行走时间(主要终点)变化最大,ST的中等,而OMC的变化最小(平均变化相对于基线,分别为5.8±4.6、3.7±4.9和1.2±分别为2.6分钟; SE与OMC的比较,P <0.001,ST与OMC的比较,P = 0.02,SE与ST的比较,P = 0.04。尽管通过步行障碍问卷和外周动脉问卷评估的疾病特异性生活质量与OMC相比,SE和ST均得到改善,但在大多数方面,ST的改善程度均大于SE。与单独使用SE或OMC相比,ST的自由活动步伐活动增加更多(每小时114±274对73±139对-6±109步),但这些差异在统计学上并不显着。结论-SE即使在患有主动脉周围动脉疾病的患者中,也比ST具有更好的跑步机行走性能。 SE更好的步行性能与ST更好的患者报告的生活质量之间的对比值得进一步研究。临床试验注册-:URL:http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/ show / NCT00132743?order = 1。唯一标识符:NCT00132743。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号