...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging >Evaluation of left ventricular dyssynchrony by onset of active myocardial force generation: a novel method that differentiates between electrical and mechanical etiologies.
【24h】

Evaluation of left ventricular dyssynchrony by onset of active myocardial force generation: a novel method that differentiates between electrical and mechanical etiologies.

机译:通过产生活跃的心肌力来评估左心室不同步:一种区分电气和机械病因的新方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Better clinical tools for measuring left ventricular electrical dyssynchrony are needed. The present study investigates if onset of active myocardial force generation (AFG) may serve as a measure of electrical dyssynchrony. METHODS AND RESULTS: In anesthetized dogs, we evaluated left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by 2 different approaches. First, we measured timing of peak myocardial shortening velocity and strain. Second, we measured the first sign of tension development by onset AFG as defined by the myocardial pressure-segment length loop upward shift from its passive-elastic state. Electrical dyssynchrony was measured by intramyocardial electromyograms (IM-EMG). Dyssynchrony was quantified as peak intersegment time difference and as standard deviation of timing for 6 to 8 myocardial segments. During baseline, reduced preload and myocardial ischemia shortening velocity and strain indicated segmental mechanical heterogeneity, whereas onset AFG and onset R in IM-EMG indicated synchronous activation of all segments. After induction of left bundle-branch block, all methods indicated dyssynchrony. Peak intersegment time difference for shortening velocity and strain showed weak correlations (r=0.17 and 0.16) and weak agreements (mean differences, -48+/-27 ms and -28+/-27 ms, respectively) with IM-EMG. Onset AFG by pressure-segment length loops, however, correlated well with IM-EMG (r=0.93), and agreement was good (mean difference, -0.6+/-6.8 ms). Results were similar for standard deviation of timing. Onset AFG from pressure-strain analysis by echocardiography showed accuracy similar to sonomicrometry. CONCLUSIONS: Onset AFG was an accurate marker of myocardial electrical activation and was superior to shortening velocity and strain. Identification of electrical dyssynchrony by onset AFG may be feasible clinically using left ventricular pressure-strain analysis.
机译:背景:需要更好的临床工具来测量左心室电不同步。本研究调查了主动心肌力量的产生(AFG)是否可以作为电不同步的一种量度。方法和结果:在麻醉的狗中,我们通过两种不同的方法评估了左心室机械不同步。首先,我们测量了峰值心肌缩短速度和应变的时间。其次,我们测量了由AFG引起的张力发展的第一个迹象,AFG是由心肌压力段长度环从其被动弹性状态向上移动所定义的。通过心肌内肌电图(IM-EMG)测量电不同步。不同步定量为节段间的时间差峰值和6至8个心肌节段的定时标准偏差。在基线期间,降低的预紧力和心肌缺血,速度和应变的缩短表明节段机械异质性,而IM-EMG中的AFG发作和R发作则表明所有节段均同步激活。诱导左束支传导阻滞后,所有方法均显示不同步。与IM-EMG相比,用于缩短速度和应变的峰值段间时间差显示出弱相关性(r = 0.17和0.16),并且一致性也很弱(均值分别为-48 +/- 27 ms和-28 +/- 27 ms)。然而,通过压力段长度循环进行的AFG发作与IM-EMG的相关性很好(r = 0.93),并且一致性良好(平均差异为-0.6 +/- 6.8 ms)。时间标准偏差的结果相似。通过超声心动图进行压力应变分析得出的AFG表现出与体测法相似的准确性。结论:AFG起搏是心肌电激活的准确标志,优于缩短速度和应变。使用左心室压力-应变分析在临床上通过AFG识别电不同步可能是可行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号