首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Animal Science >Brazilian beef cattle feedlot manure management: a country survey.
【24h】

Brazilian beef cattle feedlot manure management: a country survey.

机译:巴西肉牛育肥场粪便管理:一项国家调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

No information regarding the management of manure from beef cattle feedlots is available for Brazil. To fill this knowledge gap, a survey of 73 feedlots was conducted in 7 Brazilian states. In this survey, questions were asked regarding animal characteristics, their diets, and manure handling management from generation to disposal. These feedlots finished 831,450 animals in 2010. The predominant breed fed was Nellore, with average feeding periods of 60 to 135 d. Corn was the primary source of grain used in the feedlot diets (76% of surveyed animals) with concentrate inclusion levels ranging from 81 to 90% (38% of surveyed animals). The most representative manure management practice was the removal of manure from pens only at the end of the feeding period. Subsequently, the manure was stored in mounds before being applied to crop and pasture lands. Runoff, mainly from rainwater, was collected in retention ponds and used for agriculture. However, the quantity of runoff was not known. Manure was composted for only 20% of the animals in the survey and was treated in anaerobic digesters for only 1% of the animals. Manure from 59% of the cattle surveyed was used as fertilizer, providing a cost savings over the use of synthetic fertilizers. Overall, chemical analysis of the manure before application to fields was conducted for the manure of 56% of the surveyed animals, but the exact quantity applied (per hectare) was unknown for 48%. Feedlots representing 48% of the surveyed animals noted similar or greater crop and pasture yields when using manure, rather than synthetic fertilizers. In addition, 32% mentioned an increase in soil organic matter. Feedlots representing 88% of the surveyed cattle indicated that information concerning management practices that improve manure use efficiency is lacking. Feedlots representing 93% of the animals in the survey reported having basic information regarding the generation of energy and fertilizer with anaerobic digesters. However, only 1 feedlot implemented this technology. In conclusion, the manure management evaluated in this study represents an important indirect economic benefit that was represented by decreased use of synthetic fertilizers in crops. However, little attention was given to the specific treatments and environmental impacts of handling manure. This survey provides information that should assist in the development of better research practices and broader application of future models.
机译:没有关于巴西肉牛饲养场粪便管理的信息。为了填补这一知识空白,在巴西的7个州进行了73个饲养场的调查。在这项调查中,询问了有关动物特征,它们的饮食以及从产生到处置的粪便处理管理的问题。这些饲养场在2010年完成了831450只动物的饲养。饲喂的主要品种是内洛尔,平均饲养时间为60至135天。玉米是育肥场日粮(占被调查动物的76%)中所用谷物的主要来源,其浓缩物含量介于81%至90%(占被调查动物的38%)之间。最有代表性的粪便管理方法是仅在饲喂期结束时从围栏中清除粪便。随后,将粪便存储在土堆中,然后再用于农作物和牧场。主要来自雨水的径流被收集在蓄水池中,用于农业。但是,径流量尚不清楚。在调查中,粪便仅对20%的动物进行了堆肥处理,而厌氧消化池中仅对1%的动物进行了处理。被调查的牲畜中有59%的粪便用作肥料,比使用合成肥料节省了成本。总体而言,对被调查的动物中56%的粪便进行了粪便化学分析,但48%的确切施用量(每公顷)未知。在使用肥料而非合成肥料的情况下,代表48%的被调查动物的饲养场注意到作物和牧场的产量相似或更高。此外,有32%的人提到土壤有机质增加。代表88%的被调查牛的饲养场表示缺少有关提高粪便使用效率的管理措施的信息。据调查,代表93%的动物的育肥场具有有关利用厌氧消化池产生能量和肥料的基本信息。但是,只有1个育肥场实施了该技术。总之,本研究评估的粪肥管理代表了一项重要的间接经济利益,其主要表现为减少了农作物中合成肥料的使用。但是,很少关注粪肥的特殊处理方法和对环境的影响。该调查提供的信息应有助于更好的研究实践的发展和未来模型的广泛应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号