首页> 外文学位 >Sustainability Implications of Alternative Feedlot Management Practices and On-ranch Genetic Evaluations in Beef Cattle.
【24h】

Sustainability Implications of Alternative Feedlot Management Practices and On-ranch Genetic Evaluations in Beef Cattle.

机译:肉牛替代饲养场管理实践和牧场遗传评估的可持续性意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The demand on agriculture to produce healthy and wholesome products will increase along with the growing world population. The social movement towards sustainability has also applied pressure on agriculture to produce food in a manner that is more efficient, better for the environment, and satisfies societal needs. Sustainability in agriculture has broad goals (USDA, 2007), and encompasses three main aspects: environmental wellbeing, economic sufficiency, and human social needs. However, it is difficult to satisfy all three aspects of sustainability due to the conflicting nature of those aspects (Heitschmidt et al., 1996). Alternative production practices (e.g., natural and organic) have been proposed as a more sustainable option to conventional practices. Often these alternative practices rely less heavily on modern technological inputs and rely more on "natural" inputs (e.g., integrated pest management instead of chemical pesticides, manure application in place of synthetic fertilizer). Technologies such as metabolic modifiers offer efficiency enhancement in beef production (Preston, 1999) and DNA-based technology offers an opportunity to improve the accuracy of genetic evaluations and response to selection (Pollak, 2005).;Increasing attention is being given to the environmental implications of animal agriculture, especially as they relate to greenhouse gas ( GHG) emissions. Carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide are the GHG of great importance to global warming, with the latter two being most relevant in animal agriculture. Animal calorimetry and digestive modeling offer methods to measure and predict GHG emissions, respectively (Kebreab et al., 2006).;Conventional feedlot management systems often utilize metabolic modifiers (growth promoting implants, beta-adrenergic agonists, and ionophores) to improve efficiency and profits. In contrast, Never Ever 3 is a feedlot management system where cattle never receive growth promotants, antibiotics, or animal fed by-products and as such is representative of a "natural" production system. System-based research is needed to determine the contributions of conventional and alternative systems to the goals of sustainability.;Genetic evaluations have allowed for the genetic improvement of beef cattle through increased accuracy of selection and response to selection. Expected progeny differences (EPD) are the expected performance values of an offspring based on performance records and pedigree expressed as a deviation from the population mean (Bourdon, 2000). Goals of genetic evaluation and the use of EPDs include selection of high performance animals for economically-relevant traits with the objective of ultimately improving the profitability of beef operations (Enns and Garrick, 2003). Breed associations are responsible for the production of these EPDs. The American Angus Association (AAA) is the association that generates EPDs for the Angus breed. While breed association EPDs offer great benefits towards genetic improvement, they do not take into account the environmental effects associated with a specific ranch. According to Pollak (2005) breed association EPDs may not translate perfectly to use on the commercial ranch due to the fact that the data used for EPD generation is often collected at the purebred level and the fact that few carcass data are collected. Therefore commercial producers may benefit from the production of ranch-specific EPDs. Paternity determination based on DNA marker technology has enabled pedigree determination and thus generation of EPDs when multiple-sire breeding pastures are used, which is often the case in commercial operations. On-ranch EPDs offer benefits including sire evaluation based on performance specific to that ranch and evaluation of traits not included in breed association evaluations. Therefore comparison of the performance of AAA EPDs to on-ranch EPDs is needed to evaluate the benefits associated with the generation of the ranch specific evaluations.
机译:随着世界人口的增长,对农业生产健康和有益健康产品的需求将增加。向可持续发展迈进的社会运动也向农业施加了压力,要求其以更高效,更有利于环境并满足社会需求的方式生产粮食。农业的可持续性具有广泛的目标(USDA,2007),包括三个主要方面:环境福祉,经济自给自足和人类社会需求。但是,由于这三个方面的矛盾性质,很难满足可持续性的所有三个方面(Heitschmidt等,1996)。已经提出了替代性生产实践(例如,天然和有机)作为常规实践的更可持续的选择。这些替代做法通常较少地依赖于现代技术投入,而更多地依赖于“自然”投入(例如,综合虫害管理而不是化学农药,施用肥料代替合成肥料)。代谢修饰剂等技术可提高牛肉生产效率(普雷斯顿,1999年),基于DNA的技术为提高遗传评估的准确性和对选择的反应提供了机会(Pollak,2005年);对环境的关注日益增加动物农业的意义,尤其是与温室气体排放有关的意义。二氧化碳,甲烷和一氧化二氮是对全球变暖极为重要的温室气体,后两者与畜牧业最相关。动物量热法和消化模拟法分别提供了测量和预测温室气体排放的方法(Kebreab等,2006)。常规饲养场管理系统通常利用代谢调节剂(促进生长的植入物,β-肾上腺素能激动剂和离子载体)来提高效率和利润。相反,Never Ever 3是一个饲养场管理系统,在该系统中,牛从不接受生长促进剂,抗生素或动物饲养的副产品,因此代表了“天然”生产系统。需要基于系统的研究来确定常规系统和替代系统对可持续性目标的贡献。基因评估已通过提高选择的准确性和对选择的反应,对肉牛进行了遗传改良。预期后代差异(EPD)是基于性能记录和血统的后代的预期性能值,表示为与总体平均值的偏差(Bourdon,2000)。遗传评估和使用EPD的目标包括选择具有经济相关性状的高性能动物,以期最终提高牛肉生产的利润(Enns和Garrick,2003年)。品种协会负责生产这些EPD。美国安格斯协会(AAA)是为安格斯品种生成EPD的协会。尽管品种协会的EPD可以为遗传改良带来巨大好处,但它们并未考虑与特定牧场相关的环境影响。根据Pollak(2005)的说法,由于EPD生成所用的数据通常是在纯种水平上收集的,而collected体数据很少被收集到,因此繁殖协会EPD可能无法完全翻译成商业牧场使用。因此,商业生产者可能会受益于牧场专用的EPD。基于DNA标记技术的亲子鉴定可以实现系谱确定,从而在使用多父系育种牧场时可以生成EPD,这在商业运营中通常是这样。牧场上的EPD提供的好处包括基于牧场特定性能的父亲评估以及品种协会评估中未包括的性状评估。因此,需要比较AAA EPD与牧场上EPD的性能,以评估与牧场特定评估的产生相关的收益。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cooprider, Krista Lynn.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Davis.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Davis.;
  • 学科 Agriculture Animal Culture and Nutrition.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 109 p.
  • 总页数 109
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号