首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Animal Science >BIOETHICS SYMPOSIUM: The ethical food movement: what does it mean for the role of science and scientists in current debates about animal agriculture?
【24h】

BIOETHICS SYMPOSIUM: The ethical food movement: what does it mean for the role of science and scientists in current debates about animal agriculture?

机译:生物伦理学研讨会:道德的食品运动:这对科学和科学家在当前有关动物农业的辩论中的作用意味着什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Contemporary animal agriculture is increasingly criticized on ethical grounds. Consequently, current policy and legislative discussions have become highly controversial as decision makers attempt to reconcile concerns about the impacts of animal production on animal welfare, the environment, and on the efficacy of antibiotics required to ensure human health with demands for abundant, affordable, safe food. Clearly, the broad implications for US animal agriculture of what appears to be a burgeoning movement relative to ethical food production must be understood by animal agriculture stakeholders. The potential effects of such developments on animal agricultural practices, corporate marketing strategies, and public perceptions of the ethics of animal production must also be clarified. To that end, it is essential to acknowledge that people's beliefs about which food production practices are appropriate are tied to diverse, latent value systems. Thus, relying solely on scientific information as a means to resolve current debates about animal agriculture is unlikely to be effective. The problem is compounded when scientific information is used inappropriately or strategically to advance a political agenda. Examples of the interface between science and ethics in regards to addressing currently contentious aspects of food animal production (animal welfare, antimicrobial use, and impacts of animal production practices on the environment) are reviewed. The roles of scientists and science in public debates about animal agricultural practices are also examined. It is suggested that scientists have a duty to contribute to the development of sound policy by providing clear and objectively presented information, by clarifying misinterpretations of science, and by recognizing the differences between presenting data vs. promoting their own value judgments in regard to how and which data should be used to establish policy. Finally, the role of the media in shaping public opinions on key issues pertaining to animal agriculture is also discussed. copyright American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved.
机译:当代动物农业越来越受到伦理学的批评。因此,当前的政策和立法讨论引起了极大的争议,因为决策者试图调和对动物生产对动物福利,环境以及确保人类健康所需的抗生素功效的影响的关注,而这需要大量,可负担,安全的需求。餐饮。显然,畜牧业利益相关者必须理解相对于合乎道德的粮食生产而言,这似乎正在蓬勃发展的运动对美国畜牧业的广泛影响。还必须弄清这种发展对动物农业实践,公司营销策略以及公众对动物生产伦理的潜在影响。为此,必须承认人们关于哪种食品生产方法合适的信念与多样的,潜在的价值体系息息相关。因此,仅依靠科学信息来解决当前有关动物农业的争论不太可能有效。当科学信息被不适当地或战略性地用于推进政治议程时,问题就更加复杂了。本文就解决食用动物生产当前争议的方面(动物福利,抗菌药物的使用以及动物生产方式对环境的影响)方面的科学与伦理之间的接口实例进行了回顾。还研究了科学家和科学在有关动物农业实践的公开辩论中的作用。建议科学家有责任通过提供清晰,客观的信息,澄清对科学的误解,认识到呈现数据与促进自己对如何以及如何进行价值判断之间的差异,为制定合理的政策做出贡献。应该使用哪些数据来建立策略。最后,还讨论了媒体在塑造有关动物农业关键问题的公众舆论中的作用。美国动物科学学会版权所有。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号