...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Animal Science >Effects of restricted feed intake on finishing pigs weighing between 68 and 114 kilograms fed twice or 6 times daily
【24h】

Effects of restricted feed intake on finishing pigs weighing between 68 and 114 kilograms fed twice or 6 times daily

机译:限制采食量对每天两次或六次饲喂68至114公斤体重的育肥猪的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In a previous study with limit-fed gestating gilts, we observed that gilts fed 6 times/d had greater ADG than those fed the same amount over 2 feedings. To confirm these earlier responses, we used finishing pigs as a model in two 42-d trials and two 28-d trials to evaluate the effects of restricted feed intake and feeding frequency (2 vs. 6 times/d, floor fed) on pig performance between 68 and 114 kg. In all experiments, pigs (10/pen) were housed in 1.8 x 3.1 m pens with a half-solid, half-slatted concrete floor. Pigs were fed a corn-and soybean meal-based diet formulated to 1.15% standardized ileal digestible Lys and 3,294 kcal of ME/kg. In Exp. 1 to 3, energy and Lys were supplied to pigs according to NRC (1998) calculations to target an ADG of 0.80 kg. In Exp. 4, the diet was supplied to pigs to target an ADG of 0.80 kg (low feed intake) or 0.95 kg (high feed intake) to determine if the amount of energy above the maintenance requirement and feeding frequency affected pig performance. Pigs were fed by dropping similar amounts of feed onto the solid concrete floor either 2 (0700 or 1400 h) or 6 times (3 meals within 2 h at the morning and afternoon feedings) per day with an Accu-Drop Feed Dispenser (AP Systems, Assumption, IL). In Exp. 1 and 2, pigs fed 6 times daily had increased (P < 0.02) ADG and G: F compared with pigs fed 2 times per day. Greater feeding frequency increased (P < 0.05) the duration of time spent feeding and standing and reduced the lying time. In Exp. 3, a third treatment was included to determine whether the improvements in performance were due to decreased feed wastage. This treatment was designed to minimize feed wastage by dropping feed closer to the floor for pigs fed 2 times per day. Pigs fed 6 times daily had improved (P < 0.05) ADG and G: F compared with pigs in either treatment fed 2 times per day. No difference (P > 0.05) in performance was observed between pigs fed 2 times per day when feed was dropped from the feed drop or by the modified method. In Exp. 4, increasing the feeding frequency from 2 to 6 times per day improved (P < 0.01) ADG and G: F for pigs fed the low feed intake and tended to increase (P < 0.06) ADG and improved (P < 0.05) G: F for pigs fed the high feed intake. In limit-feeding situations, increasing the frequency of feeding from 2 to 6 times per day improved pig performance, which confirmed our earlier findings in gestating gilts.
机译:在先前对限饲母猪进行的研究中,我们观察到每天饲喂6次的母猪在两次饲喂中饲喂同等量的母猪的ADG高于同等量的母猪。为了确认这些较早的反应,我们在两个42天试验和两个28天试验中以肥育猪为模型,以评估限制采食量和饲喂频率(每天2次vs. 6次/天,最低采食量)对猪的影响性能介于68和114公斤之间。在所有实验中,将猪(每只10只)装在1.8 x 3.1 m圈圈的半实心,半平铺混凝土地板中。给猪喂以玉米和豆粕为基础的日粮,该日粮配制为1.15%的标准化回肠可消化Lys和3294 kcal ME / kg。在实验中参照图1至3,根据NRC(1998)的计算向猪提供能量和Lys,以使ADG为0.80kg。在实验中如图4所示,向猪提供日粮的目标是ADG为0.80千克(低饲料摄入量)或0.95千克(高饲料摄入量),以确定超过维持需求量和饲喂频率的能量消耗是否影响了猪的生长性能。每天使用Accu-Drop饲料分配器(AP Systems)将相似量的饲料以2次(0700或1400小时)或6次(早晨和下午的喂养时间在2小时内3餐)滴入固体混凝土地板上进行喂养(假设,IL)。在实验中与图1和图2相比,每天饲喂6次的猪与每天饲喂2次的猪相比,ADG和G:F增加(P <0.02)。较高的喂养频率可增加(P <0.05)喂养和站立的时间,并减少躺卧时间。在实验中如图3所示,包括第三种处理以确定性能的改善是否是由于饲料浪费的减少。设计这种处理方法是通过每天饲喂2次的猪将饲料降低到接近地面的位置来最大程度地减少饲料浪费。每天饲喂6次的猪与每天饲喂2次的两种猪相比,ADG和G:F均有改善(P <0.05)。每天从饲料滴中滴入饲料或采用改良方法时,每天饲喂2次的猪之间没有观察到性能差异(P> 0.05)。在实验中如图4所示,将饲喂频率从每天2次提高到每天6次改善了(P <0.01)ADG和G:F:低饲喂量的猪的ADG和G:F倾向于增加(P <0.06)ADG和改善(P <0.05)G:喂高饲料采食量的猪为F。在限制饲喂的情况下,将饲喂频率从每天2次增加到每天6次可以改善猪的生产性能,这证实了我们在早期母猪妊娠中的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号